Re: Active Java packagers

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > I'll not attend Debconf but I'm interrested in any effort bringing > Java Policy in a refreshed state. Is there a repo. somewhere to > check current state (beside java-common pakage bugs [1]) ? > I'm not a DD, will not be

Re: RFS: libslf4j-java (updated package)

Le lundi 15 juin 2009 23:23:34, Vincent Fourmond a écrit : > Hello Damien ! > > Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > > Concerning my RFS, should we stop uploading new packages revisions until > > some fix java-gcj-compat-dev ? > > If it FTBS in a chroot, sure enough: uploaders can't build... Pwned! I

Re: RFS: libslf4j-java (updated package)

Hello Damien ! Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > Concerning my RFS, should we stop uploading new packages revisions until > some fix java-gcj-compat-dev ? If it FTBS in a chroot, sure enough: uploaders can't build... Cheers ! Vincent -- If there was anything that depressed him more

RFS: libspring-2.5-java

Dear mentors and java maintainers, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libspring-2.5-java". * Package name: libspring-2.5-java Version : 2.5.6.SEC01-1 Upstream Author : SpringSource Inc. * URL : http://www.springsource.org/ * License : Apache 2.0 Secti

Re: RFS: libslf4j-java (updated package)

Le lundi 15 juin 2009 22:54:33, Torsten Werner a écrit : > Hi Damien, Hi Torsten, > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Damien > > Raude-Morvan wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.5.8-1 > > of package "libslf4j-java". > > unfortunately java-gcj-compat-dev is still broken: >

Re: Active Java packagers

Le lundi 15 juin 2009 18:38:17, Matthew Johnson a écrit : > Hi all, Hi Matthew, > Relating to both the Eclipse stuff and the fact that I'd like to try and > improve the Java packaging policy in Debian and have booked a debconf > session to discuss it, I'll not attend Debconf but I'm interrested

Re: RFS: libslf4j-java (updated package)

Hi Damien, On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.5.8-1 > of package "libslf4j-java". unfortunately java-gcj-compat-dev is still broken: . Someone needs to fix this bu

RFS: libslf4j-java (updated package)

Dear mentors and java maintainers, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.5.8-1 of package "libslf4j-java". It builds these binary packages: libslf4j-java - Simple Logging Facade for Java The package is lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - http://mentors.de

Re: Active Java packagers

Marcus Better wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Johnson wrote: who is still active here and interested in the Java packaging policy? count me in. Eric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta

Re: Active Java packagers

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Johnson wrote: > who is still active here and interested in the Java packaging policy? I am... And BTW if anyone feels they have stopped being active, please drop a line so we can keep an eye on your packages. Cheers, Marcus -BEGIN PGP

Re: Bug#526489: Time to orphan eclipse? (Bug#526489: eclipse: should this package be orphaned?)

Hi Markus, Jens and list: On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 03:52:34PM +0200, Jens Kapitza wrote: > Hi, can I be of any help? (I would take it over) > > I can offer my time but i think i need some help. > You could ask to join the java team for maintaining eclipse, so you can commit in the pkg-java's SVN

join the java team for maintaining eclipse

You could ask to join the java team for maintaining eclipse, so you can commit in the pkg-java's SVN and updating the package. (*) What information is needet to join the java team for maintaining eclipse? Should i read some spezial things? (*) Ask about this in debian-java@lists.debian.org

Re: Java package of another java package

On Mon Jun 15 16:28, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > I am continuing my task of packaging GDCM (http://gdcm.sf.net). It > provides a wrapped layer in java, which can easily be built using: > > $ cat debian/control > ... > Build-Depends: openjdk-6-jdk > > Everything builds fine. However I am now tr

Active Java packagers

Hi all, Relating to both the Eclipse stuff and the fact that I'd like to try and improve the Java packaging policy in Debian and have booked a debconf session to discuss it, who is still active here and interested in the Java packaging policy? (DD or otherwise) Matt -- Matthew Johnson signatu

Re: Bug#526489: Time to orphan eclipse? (Bug#526489: eclipse: should this package be orphaned?)

On Mon Jun 15 16:32, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Jens Kapitza wrote: >> >> I can offer my time but i think i need some help. > > About half a year ago I offered sponsoring packages to push > things but I have basically zero Java experience and can only > check about Debian policy an

Re: Bug#526489: Time to orphan eclipse? (Bug#526489: eclipse: should this package be orphaned?)

On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Jens Kapitza wrote: Hi, can I be of any help? (I would take it over) I can offer my time but i think i need some help. About half a year ago I offered sponsoring packages to push things but I have basically zero Java experience and can only check about Debian policy and s

Java package of another java package

Hi there, I am continuing my task of packaging GDCM (http://gdcm.sf.net). It provides a wrapped layer in java, which can easily be built using: $ cat debian/control ... Build-Depends: openjdk-6-jdk Everything builds fine. However I am now trying to link to libvtk-java package, which seems to

Re: Bug#526489: Time to orphan eclipse? (Bug#526489: eclipse: should this package be orphaned?)

Hi, can I be of any help? (I would take it over) I can offer my time but i think i need some help. Background: I'm working with eclipse since version (~3.0) and with debian linux since 5 years. I have some knowledge in building debian packages. --- Jens Kapitza -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Re: Re: Bug#526489: Time to orphan eclipse? (Bug#526489: eclipse: should this package be orphaned?)

* Markus Knauer [2009-06-15 06:21]: > Or did you contact one of the persons of the Linux Distro Project? Maybe they > have some resources they can spend on that? Unfortunately, we do not (and we're now known as the Linux Tools Project :) . However, we are working on making the Eclipse SDK ("ecli

Re: RFS: jetty6

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ludovic Claude wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jetty6". Nice, it is badly needed. > The upload would fix these bugs: 425152, 454529, 458399, 498582, 527571, > 528389, 530720 No it wouldn't. Those are filed against the "jetty" pac

Re: Re: Bug#526489: Time to orphan eclipse? (Bug#526489: eclipse: should this package be orphaned?)

Hi *, can I be of any help? I don't think that I have the time to take over the entire packaging of Eclipse in Debian - at least not at the moment, but I can offer to help and advice anyone who would be willing to do this. I am building all those packages that you can download from eclipse.org/do

Fwd: Re: Bug#526489: Time to orphan eclipse? (Bug#526489: eclipse: should this package be orphaned?)

Forwarded from -devel -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Re: Bug#526489: Time to orphan eclipse? (Bug#526489: eclipse: should this package be orphaned?) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 From: Ana Guerrero To: Jerry Haltom , Michael Koch , Matthias Klose , Stephan Michels On Wed, May 20