Re: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:46 AM, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That version uses javap -verbose, which is rather slow, other > suggestions welcome. It uses the following table: > > highest version in the package => depends line > > 50 => java-runtime6 > 49 => java-runtime6 | java-ru

Bug#505166: java-common: typo in policy.xml

Package: java-common Version: 0.30 Severity: minor Tags: patch patch in attachment -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.27-7-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTY

Re: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch

On Tue Oct 28 09:25, Matthias Klose wrote: > I filed bug reports for packages building with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, > producing java bytecode for version 50, and which still depend on > java-runtime5, or earlier (attached at the end). (minor thread hijacking) I've just uploaded a version of javah