Riku Voipio schrieb:
> Also I notice the packages are built with ecj using the slowish gij
> interpreter. perhaps the package build could be made faster by using
> gcj precompiled ecj-gcj package?
unfortunately this doesn't help; java-gcj-compat-dev already depends on ecj-gcj.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 07:50:42PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Build times are generally acceptable, with the exception of armel,
> which needed almost 45 hours.
> armel is at about 19 hours, so almost acceptable. However, in
> practice, this likely adds to the 45 hours of openjdk-6, resulting
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand all that, but the question still stands: is the compiler
> really moving a memory write past a memory barrier? ISTR we did have
> a discussion on gcc-list about that, but it was a while ago and should
> now be
Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I've seen this on-and-off again on the hppa-linux port. The issue has,
>>> in my experience, been a compiler problem. My standard operating
>>> procedure is to methodically add volatile to the ato
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've seen this on-and-off again on the hppa-linux port. The issue has,
>> in my experience, been a compiler problem. My standard operating
>> procedure is to methodically add volatile to the atomic.h operations
>> until it
Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is there anything from an outsider that could help?
>
> I've seen this on-and-off again on the hppa-linux port. The issue has,
> in my experience, been a compiler problem. My standard operating
>
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there anything from an outsider that could help?
I've seen this on-and-off again on the hppa-linux port. The issue has,
in my experience, been a compiler problem. My standard operating
procedure is to methodically add v
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Onkar Shinde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have updated the packaging for libcommons-jexl-java in pkg-java svn
> to make it suitable for latest upstream version 1.1. Can someone
> please review and upload it. You should get .orig.tar.gz by simply
> doi
8 matches
Mail list logo
