Pinjaman uang tunai tanpa agunan dari bank terbesar di asia ,memberikan
kemudahan bagi anda untuk
mendapatkannya dengan persyaratan yang sangat mudah dan flexible cukup
dengan fc ktp dan
fc credit card (sisi depannya saja),fc billing tagihan 1 bulan terakhir
(bila ada)
dan bunga yang sangat k
Onkar Shinde wrote:
> As I was the one who updated batik in Ubuntu I want to ask few
> comments about the differences between Ubuntu packaging and Debian
> packaging. I haven't yet tried to build the package.
>
> 1. Are you sure following change is correct -
> * Removing 02_fix_jar_target, no lon
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 1:24 AM, Eric Lavarde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought that Batik 1.7 is not backwards compatible with Batik 1.6 (I
> remember vaguely to have issues with this). If I'm right, wouldn't it make
> sense to have a batik1.7 package name and keep batik (1.6)?
IMO it would
Hi,
I thought that Batik 1.7 is not backwards compatible with Batik 1.6 (I
remember vaguely to have issues with this). If I'm right, wouldn't it
make sense to have a batik1.7 package name and keep batik (1.6)?
Thanks, Eric
Vincent Fourmond wrote:
Hello,
I've done quite a good deal of w
4 matches
Mail list logo