Re: RFS: libnanoxml2-java

2008-08-02 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
> Everything looks good now, and I'd be happy to upload, _but_: > > you now have: > > Suggests: nanoxml2-java-doc > > whereas you actually want: > > Suggests: libnanoxml2-java-doc > Fixed and uploaded to mentors. Thank you for your help. Sveinung -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wi

Re: Review wanted on a package

2008-08-02 Thread Iustin Pop
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 10:33:14PM +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote: > On Mon Jul 28 20:12, Iustin Pop wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm trying to package protobuf (http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/). > > The source package will generate C++, Python and Java bindings. Since > > I'm not knowledgeable with

Re: building openjdk-6 for m68k

2008-08-02 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 03:00:31AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > the openjdk-6 6b11-4 should build on m68k. It may take a few weeks, > but I currently don't see any issue with it. If you do so, please keep > the build tree, so that the testsuite can be run, after the build > finishes (taking some

Re: RFS : Mina

2008-08-02 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Sat Aug 02 01:30, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > > - changelog: since it's not been uploaded to Debian yet, can you > > combine the changelog entries into just one. Pretty much changelog > > entries should correspond to uploads (and obviously the debian revision > > will be 1) > > It has been