Re: Bug#491626: RFS : Mina

2008-07-29 Thread Ben Finney
"Damien Raude-Morvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It builds these binary packages: > libmina-java - Apache Mina - Java network application framework > libmina-java-doc - Apache Mina - Java network application framework These two synopses are identical; you should differentiate them by summarisi

RFS: sqlline

2008-07-29 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sqlline". * Package name: sqlline Version : 1.0.2-1 Upstream Author : Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://sqlline.sourceforge.net/ * License : BSD (3 clause) Section : utils I

RFS : Mina

2008-07-29 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mina". * Package name: mina Version : 1.1.7.dfsg-2 Upstream Author : Apache Software Foundation * URL : http://mina.apache.org * License : Apache Licence 2.0 Section : libs It builds these bina

Re: OpenJDK for lenny

2008-07-29 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 15:34 -0700, David Herron wrote: > Each synchronized security release involves simultaneous release of > all current binary JDK bundles as well as OpenJDK 6/7 source releases > of the same bug fixes. For OpenJDK there is some kind of behind the > scenes source handshakin

Re: OpenJDK for lenny

2008-07-29 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Matthias Klose] > So, we are late with OpenJDK for lenny. I still think lenny would > benefit from having OpenJDK. I'm proposing the following steps, > realizing that not all of them probably can be realized. Just for the record, Debian Edu would very much like to have the new openjdk package in