Re: java-common_0.28_i386.changes REJECTED

2008-03-05 Thread Matthias Klose
Michael Koch writes: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 08:52:30PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Joerg Jaspert writes: > > > Hi Maintainer, > > > > > > rejected, lots of > > > > > > E: default-jdk: no-copyright-file > > > E: default-jdk: debian-changelog-file-missing-or-wrong-name > > > > noted. > >

Re: java-common_0.28_i386.changes REJECTED

2008-03-05 Thread Michael Koch
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 11:10:42PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > which policy change? There's nothing new which does change the state > of the current java policy. If you do want to use the opportunity of > that change to clean up the policy, that's fine with me, but please > don't use that "ar

Re: java-common_0.28_i386.changes REJECTED

2008-03-05 Thread Michael Koch
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 08:52:30PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Joerg Jaspert writes: > > Hi Maintainer, > > > > rejected, lots of > > > > E: default-jdk: no-copyright-file > > E: default-jdk: debian-changelog-file-missing-or-wrong-name > > noted. > > > Additionally you might want to listen/t

Re: java-common_0.28_i386.changes REJECTED

2008-03-05 Thread Matthias Klose
Joerg Jaspert writes: > Hi Maintainer, > > rejected, lots of > > E: default-jdk: no-copyright-file > E: default-jdk: debian-changelog-file-missing-or-wrong-name noted. > Additionally you might want to listen/talk to others in the java team, which > have concerns about the package, just asking m

java-common_0.28_i386.changes REJECTED

2008-03-05 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Hi Maintainer, rejected, lots of E: default-jdk: no-copyright-file E: default-jdk: debian-changelog-file-missing-or-wrong-name Additionally you might want to listen/talk to others in the java team, which have concerns about the package, just asking me about it... -- bye Joerg === If you do

java-common_0.28_i386.changes is NEW

2008-03-05 Thread Debian Installer
(new) default-jdk-builddep_1.5-28_i386.deb optional devel Standard Java or Java compatible build dependencies This package points to the build dependencies used to build packages requiring a Java or Java compatible Development Kit. (new) default-jdk_1.5-28_i386.deb optional devel Standard Java or

Bug#469527: policy: Alternatives for minor versions of Java

2008-03-05 Thread Stepan Koltsov
Package: java-common Version: 0.25 Severity: normal It's often required to run Java application with concrete version of JDK: 1.4, 1.5 or 1.6, even if JRE is backward compatible. To achieve this, new executables should be created in /usr/bin: java1.4 java1.5 java1.6 javac1.4 javac1.4 javac1.6

Processing of java-common_0.28_i386.changes

2008-03-05 Thread Archive Administrator
java-common_0.28_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: java-common_0.28.dsc java-common_0.28.tar.gz java-common_0.28_all.deb default-jre_1.5-28_i386.deb default-jre-headless_1.5-28_i386.deb default-jdk_1.5-28_i386.deb default-jdk-builddep_1.5-28_i386.de

Re: Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-05 Thread Andrew Haley
Andrew Haley wrote: > Andrew Haley wrote: >> OK, I've found it. The ClassNotFoundException is thrown from a security >> check >> in libgcj. We are calling Method m1 from method m0, and m1's class loader >> is different from m0's class loader. We have to check that for every arg >> in m1, the ac

Re: Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-05 Thread Andrew Haley
Andrew Haley wrote: > Michael Koch wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 12:01:03PM +, Andrew Haley wrote: >>> Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: > And what was the reason? I need to know. !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.

Re: Autobuilding packages depending on sun-java6-jdk

2008-03-05 Thread Florian Weimer
* Matthias Klose: > Florian Weimer writes: >> This does not work in a pristine build environment (such as one set up >> by pbuilder) because the DLJ has to be accepted, which can't work in a >> non-interactive environment. >> >> How do you cope with that? > > Preseed the debconf value. Thanks, t