Your message dated Mon, 12 Nov 2007 07:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#449282: fixed in java-common 0.27
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Accepted:
java-common_0.27.dsc
to pool/main/j/java-common/java-common_0.27.dsc
java-common_0.27.tar.gz
to pool/main/j/java-common/java-common_0.27.tar.gz
java-common_0.27_all.deb
to pool/main/j/java-common/java-common_0.27_all.deb
Override entries for your package:
java-common_0.27.dsc - s
java-common_0.27_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
java-common_0.27.dsc
java-common_0.27.tar.gz
java-common_0.27_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
Hello Paul,
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 10:08:13PM +, Paul Cager wrote:
> I would say it's not _entirely_ the library developers' fault. JavaCC
> has always had a rather inconsistent use of Exceptions - ParseException
> (thrown for syntactic errors) extends Exception, but TokenMgrError
> (thrown
Michael Koch wrote:
> Hello,
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 10:49:29AM +0900, Sanghyeon Seo wrote:
>> In the original modifed file, ParseException extends CSSException
>> which extends RuntimeException, so it is an unchecked exception. But
>> unmodifed ParseException extends Exception by default, which
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 10:49:29AM +0900, Sanghyeon Seo wrote:
> Upstream modified ParseException.java after it was generated. Even the
> generated file says you can! ("You can modify this class to customize
> your error reporting...")
>
> In the original modifed file, ParseException exte
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 02:00:06PM -, Paul Cager wrote:
> Sorry it has taken so long for you to get a reply to your email - I think
> we have all been waiting for someone more knowledgeable to answer. Michael
> Koch has been working on Jetty 5 recently, but I know he has been away for
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 01:29:09PM -0800, Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
> Petter,
>
> I thought the Debian Java Policy (
> http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/java-policy/x86.html )
> stated that the Jar with the main method that launches the program has
> to go into /usr/bin not in /usr/share
8 matches
Mail list logo