Saxon 8 package?

2007-08-31 Thread Michael(tm) Smith
Are there any issues (license issues or otherwise) that would prevent Saxon 8 from being distributed in Debian? I noticed there was an open packaging request for Saxon 8 at one time, but that was automatically closed due to being more than a year old. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg

Re: IcedTea - a first step towards OpenJDK

2007-08-31 Thread Matthias Klose
peter green schrieb: > Matthias Klose wrote: >> ok, except wget should not be part of the b-d's, if the zip file >> already exists. >> > The configure script checks for it and errors if it is not there. well, then its cheaper to add it. >> did you set the 32bit personality before entering the

Re: IcedTea - a first step towards OpenJDK

2007-08-31 Thread peter green
Matthias Klose wrote: peter green schrieb: IcedTea is a temporary fork of OpenJDK which allows building with a free toolchain and adding/replacing code which is not yet available under a free license. First deb Packages for amd64 and i386 are available at deb http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/

Re: IcedTea - a first step towards OpenJDK

2007-08-31 Thread Matthias Klose
peter green schrieb: >> IcedTea is a temporary fork of OpenJDK which allows building with a free >> toolchain and adding/replacing code which is not yet available under a >> free >> license. First deb Packages for amd64 and i386 are available at >> >> deb http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/ubuntu/ >>

Re: IcedTea - a first step towards OpenJDK

2007-08-31 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
On 8/31/07, peter green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > However even with those things fixed it still doesn't build > for me, in a 64 bit chroot on a 64 bit box and a 32 bit chroot > on a 32 bit box I get the following errors > > find rt -name '*.java' | sort > rt-source-files.txt > nowarn -g -d