Re: [RFC] Should we remove xerces-j (libxerces-java 1.4.4)

2007-07-02 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
On 7/2/07, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/1/07, Marcus Better <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > > The RC bug has been closed, but moving argouml, libgef-java and > > arbortext-catalog to xerces2 should be done. And then, remove xerces1. > > Care to file some bug

Re: Java buildd service

2007-07-02 Thread Marcus Better
Michael Koch wrote: > This is a single-cpu/single-core machine. That fits the pattern. The problem seems to hit SMP machines. Marcus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Java buildd service

2007-07-02 Thread Michael Koch
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 01:36:19PM +0200, Marcus Better wrote: > Michael Koch wrote: > > The buildf failed but differently: > > > > > > [junit] Running org.dom4j.xpath.MatrixConcatTest > > [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0.833 sec > > Ok, so the ThreadingTest

Re: [RFC] Should we remove xerces-j (libxerces-java 1.4.4)

2007-07-02 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
On 7/1/07, Marcus Better <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > The RC bug has been closed, but moving argouml, libgef-java and > arbortext-catalog to xerces2 should be done. And then, remove xerces1. Care to file some bugs? :) OK, I'll do that asap ;-) -- Arnaud Vandyck -- To U

Re: Java buildd service

2007-07-02 Thread Marcus Better
Michael Koch wrote: > The buildf failed but differently: > > > [junit] Running org.dom4j.xpath.MatrixConcatTest > [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0.833 sec Ok, so the ThreadingTest succeeded at least. Could you send me the test result for the MatrixConcatTest

Re: Java buildd service

2007-07-02 Thread Michael Koch
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 10:53:17AM +0200, Marcus Better wrote: > Michael Koch wrote: > > the usual suspects failed which have already filed FTBFS bugs in the > > BTS. > > What was the result for dom4j? I would like to have more data on #427456. > What is the arch and CPU of the build system? The

Re: Java buildd service

2007-07-02 Thread Marcus Better
Michael Koch wrote: > the usual suspects failed which have already filed FTBFS bugs in the > BTS. What was the result for dom4j? I would like to have more data on #427456. What is the arch and CPU of the build system? Regards, Marcus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subj

Java buildd service

2007-07-02 Thread Michael Koch
Hello list, I have setup a local buildd locally to be able to testbuild all packages maintained by the Debian Java Maintainers. In the first test builds only the usual suspects failed which have already filed FTBFS bugs in the BTS. I would like to provide this service to be able to test all the