Re: RFS: opengrok

2007-07-01 Thread Michael Koch
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 02:17:13PM +0200, ?ubo? Ko??o wrote: > Sorry Michael, my fault, wrong word. > > I meant recompiling rather than rebuilding. Opengrok has generics and other > stuff, whether gcj is more like 1.4.2 . So a lot of refactoring would be > involved. > > Building against gcj is ea

Re: [RFC] Should we remove xerces-j (libxerces-java 1.4.4)

2007-07-01 Thread Marcus Better
Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > The RC bug has been closed, but moving argouml, libgef-java and > arbortext-catalog to xerces2 should be done. And then, remove xerces1. Care to file some bugs? :) Marcus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E

Re: [RFC] Should we remove xerces-j (libxerces-java 1.4.4)

2007-07-01 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
The RC bug has been closed, but moving argouml, libgef-java and arbortext-catalog to xerces2 should be done. And then, remove xerces1. On 4/12/07, Marcus Better <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: popcon reports 516 installs, versus 22756 for libxerces2-java. For the dependents, there are 172 of argouml,