Bug#363985: marked as done (Spelling mistake in package description)

2007-06-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2007 15:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363985: fixed in java-common 0.26 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Re: RFS: opengrok

2007-06-28 Thread Ľuboš Koščo
Sorry Michael, my fault, wrong word. I meant recompiling rather than rebuilding. Opengrok has generics and other stuff, whether gcj is more like 1.4.2 . So a lot of refactoring would be involved. Building against gcj is easy as you say, unless your sources are somewhere else already ;) sorry, s

Re: DocBook XSLT Java extensions & properties

2007-06-28 Thread Marcus Better
Hi, Michael(tm) Smith wrote: > I need a bit of advice around best practices for upstream Java > builds. In particular, if/how/where system-specific Java > properties should be set, and how to avoid hard-coding them in > build files. The most common way is to let your Ant build file include build.