On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 03:29:15PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thats certainly another option. You could just create a deb that
> violates the Debian Policy but is installable anyway. Problem might be
> that you have to have your own repo or some repo to host it at. You
> might be able
Quoting Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 04:27:41PM +0200, Jan-Pascal van Best wrote:
On Tue, June 5, 2007 16:08, Marcus Better wrote:
> Jan-Pascal van Best wrote:
>> What is the policy about this issue?
>
> It's generally not acceptable to duplicate code, so Debian ver
Quoting Jan-Pascal van Best <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, June 5, 2007 16:31, Marcus Better wrote:
That's what I thought, but what do we do about the 'moving
target'-argument?
You will have to check carefully that the dependencies are satisfied and
monitor changes. Pretty much same as any othe
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 04:27:41PM +0200, Jan-Pascal van Best wrote:
> On Tue, June 5, 2007 16:08, Marcus Better wrote:
> > Jan-Pascal van Best wrote:
> >> What is the policy about this issue?
> >
> > It's generally not acceptable to duplicate code, so Debian versions of
> libraries should be used.
On Tue, June 5, 2007 16:31, Marcus Better wrote:
>> That's what I thought, but what do we do about the 'moving
>> target'-argument?
>
> You will have to check carefully that the dependencies are satisfied and
> monitor changes. Pretty much same as any other package.
The difference is that solr has
On Tue, June 5, 2007 16:08, Marcus Better wrote:
> Jan-Pascal van Best wrote:
>> What is the policy about this issue?
>
> It's generally not acceptable to duplicate code, so Debian versions of
libraries should be used.
That's what I thought, but what do we do about the 'moving target'-argument?
J
Jan-Pascal van Best wrote:
> What is the policy about this issue?
It's generally not acceptable to duplicate code, so Debian versions of
libraries should be used.
Regards,
Marcus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear all,
I'l working on packaging Solr, an enterprise search server built on
Lucene. The Solr upstream source distribution contains a number of
third-party libraries (see list at the end). I think (but I'll check) that
they are all DFSG-free. I would like to use the Debian-packaged versions
of th
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:16:49AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-04 20:55]:
> > I didn't see this failure yet. So maybe this is a bug in the libffi
> > backport for arm? btw, Martin Michlmayr checked that Phil Blundell
> > has a copyright assignment
* Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-04 20:55]:
> I didn't see this failure yet. So maybe this is a bug in the libffi
> backport for arm? btw, Martin Michlmayr checked that Phil Blundell
> has a copyright assignment for GCC, so if somebody updates the arm
> libffi support for the trunk, I
10 matches
Mail list logo
