Bug#395374: java-common: [policy] clarify whether java-policy is normative

Package: java-common Version: 0.25 Severity: normal Is java-policy normative? That is, is a violation of a "should" or "must" clause in java-policy a "policy violation" and thus an RC bug? My belief is not, because a) it doesn't state in java-policy that it is a "sub-policy" b) java-policy is no

Bug#395372: java-common: [policy] relax or expand the "binaries in /usr/bin" restriction (2.3)

Package: java-common Version: 0.25 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hello, Java policy section 2.3. states: "Programs must have executable(s) in /usr/bin and be executable." I am packaging a java game (actually, a java game-related package). If my package was not a java package, I w