There was a recent message about Java 1 versus 2 runtimes in Provides
(if I remember correctly). I've brought this up before, suggesting that
those two be combined. Is there any reason not to combine the
java-runtime and java-compiler virtual packages? If not I suggest that
we proceed to do so.
ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Barry Hawkins wrote:
> I can think of a couple of reasons why numbered versions
> of .jar files are used:
>
> 1.) Java(TM) libraries have a notorious tendency
> (not unlike other languages) to not preserve
> backward compatibility between sign
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote:
>
>> 2. svn-buildpackage --svn-tag creates tags which are not compliant
>> with the Java packager instructions hosted somewhere (I lost track of
>> this page), i.e. it's X.Y.Z-N instead of RELEASE_X_Y
Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote:
2. svn-buildpackage --svn-tag creates tags which are not compliant with
the Java packager instructions hosted somewhere (I lost track of this
page), i.e. it's X.Y.Z-N instead of RELEASE_X_Y_Z-N. Do you see this as
an issue?
Thanks for your work. IIRC this was bec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Until recently, I had never used SVN and had to learn it quite quickly,
> so I created myself a list of important commands.
> I've put this list in its raw state under
> http://wiki.debian.org/Java/JavaSvn.
Than
5 matches
Mail list logo
