Re: Someone working on ws-jaxme?

Hi Eric, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote: > Hi, > > for jibx packaging (well, actually, xsd2jibx), I would need ws-jaxme as a > dependency (I'm currently using the jar jaxme-js-0.3, which is part of the > jibx sources). > I vaguely remember that someone said, he would work on jaxme. Is this > still c

Someone working on ws-jaxme?

Hi, for jibx packaging (well, actually, xsd2jibx), I would need ws-jaxme as a dependency (I'm currently using the jar jaxme-js-0.3, which is part of the jibx sources). I vaguely remember that someone said, he would work on jaxme. Is this still correct? If yes, what would be the timeline? If not, I

Re: Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.

Mladen Adamovic writes: > Andrew Haley wrote: > > > Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it? > > > Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4 > > > (Native Eclipse) and it was so unstable that in fact it was completely > > > useless. Shame

Re: Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.

Andrew Haley wrote: > Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it? > Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4 > (Native Eclipse) and it was so unstable that in fact it was completely > useless. Shame on them. Excuse me while I go behind the o

Re: Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.

Mladen Adamovic writes: > robin putters wrote: > > How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to experimental, > > while GCJ4.1 is not in unstable yet? > Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it? > Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora c

Re: Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.

robin putters wrote: How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to experimental, while GCJ4.1 is not in unstable yet? Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it? Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4 (Native Eclipse) and it was so uns

Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.

How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to experimental, while GCJ4.1 is not in unstable yet?

Re: struked with logic:iterate

Hi, "Mohan Raj Varadharajan, ISDC Chennai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > I have a row with text box and a add(submit) button. when a user clicks that > button a row has to be added. i tried with but couldn't.can u > suggest me. below is my coding which includes jsp,action, form and bean.

Re: Bug#350399: Azureus finally no longer needs non-free java. It works with gij.

[Robin Putters] > How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to > experimental, while GCJ4.1 is not in unstable yet? Does it only work with gij? What about the latest classpath release and jamvm or cocoa? If it work with those, it can to into unstable directly. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

Re: JBoss Packages?

On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 10:57:59AM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote: > Guido Guenther wrote: > > Hi Wolfgang, > > On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 07:30:20PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote: > > > >>For a) It would be helpful if you could provide a list of the needed > >>3rd party jars. Then if someone finds time cou