Re: Circular testing exuses for swt-gtk and swingwt

2005-10-05 Thread Shaun Jackman
2005/10/5, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 07:52:54PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > If it ICE's on hppa, why should it be pushed to testing, especially if > > there are no apps depending on it? AFAIK the Java Packaging Team > > wants to build these libs from the ec

Re: Circular testing exuses for swt-gtk and swingwt

2005-10-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 11:03:47AM -0600, Shaun Jackman wrote: > 2005/9/28, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >These excuses seem to be circular between swingwt and swt-gtk. > > Classic "hint" situation. They both have to go in together; the > > excuses are showing that if you move only on

Re: Current status of your swt-gtk package

2005-10-05 Thread Billy Biggs
Shaun Jackman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > as we spoke some time ago you wanted to get your swt-gtk packages to > > testing and then supersede them by the ones generate from the new > > Eclispe 3.1 (3.1.1 in the meanwhile). My packages are ready and > > gracefully work as a replacement to your package

Re: Circular testing exuses for swt-gtk and swingwt

2005-10-05 Thread Matthias Klose
Shaun Jackman writes: > 2005/9/28, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >These excuses seem to be circular between swingwt and swt-gtk. > > Classic "hint" situation. They both have to go in together; the > > excuses are showing that if you move only one in, it breaks the > > other. Send a me

Re: Current status of your swt-gtk package

2005-10-05 Thread Shaun Jackman
2005/10/2, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello Shaun, > > as we spoke some time ago you wanted to get your swt-gtk packages to > testing and then supersede them by the ones generate from the new > Eclispe 3.1 (3.1.1 in the meanwhile). My packages are ready and > gracefully work as a replaceme