Re: Eclipse 3.1-7 debs uploaded

2005-08-22 Thread Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias
Hi, I'm seeing the same error. Regards, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Eclipse 3.1-7 debs uploaded

2005-08-22 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 21:29 +0200, Niklaus Giger wrote: > After installing eclipse-platform-gcj I got the next error (see attachement). > What is still missing? Any hints would be appreciated That log file looks very similar to what I am getting on x86 after updating to the 3.1-7 packages. Th

Re: Eclipse 3.1-7 debs uploaded

2005-08-22 Thread Niklaus Giger
Thanks you very much for porting Eclipse to a free Java! It is quite some time that I am waiting for it. I just installed your debs on my PowerBook running GNU/Debian testing. Installing worked fine but while starting eclipse I got the following error: -- !SESSION 2005-08-22 21:05:37.757 -

Re: java2-runtime

2005-08-22 Thread Charles Fry
> - java1-runtime stands for Java1 (i.e. up to Java 1.2). > - java2-runtime stands for Java2 (i.e. Java 1.3 and higher). > > - free VMs generally only provide java1-runtime (java-runtime is IMHO > wrong or a typo). Does this mean that bugs should be filed with packages which provide or depend o

Re: java2-runtime

2005-08-22 Thread Al Eridani
On 8/21/05, Eric Lavarde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Charles, > > I didn't see a reply to your email so I'll have a try: > > - java1-runtime stands for Java1 (i.e. up to Java 1.2). > - java2-runtime stands for Java2 (i.e. Java 1.3 and higher). I don't know for sure what naming convention Deb

Re: java2-runtime

2005-08-22 Thread Dalibor Topic
Petter Reinholdtsen hungry.com> writes: > > > [Eric Lavarde] > > Conclusion: > > - if your package works with free VMs, you should write something > > like: kaffe | sablevm | java1-runtime. > > Is it not enough and recommended to list only one non-virtual package, > aka 'kaffe | java1-runtime'

Re: java2-runtime

2005-08-22 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Eric Lavarde] > Conclusion: > - if your package works with free VMs, you should write something > like: kaffe | sablevm | java1-runtime. Is it not enough and recommended to list only one non-virtual package, aka 'kaffe | java1-runtime' or 'sablevm | java1-runtime'? I assume would kaffe and sabl