Hi,
On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 22:00 +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:35:56 +0100,
> Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You are right, its not always a gain. Tom Tromey told me that he is
> > aware of one case where the native library is slower then interpreting
> > the j
Hi,
On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 16:29 -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote:
> Okay from how I understand it: The classloader is not altered and must
> still use Jars (since applications, like Eclipse, do override and make
> their own classloader). The classloader returns a byte[] representing
> the resource to the
Hi,
On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 21:28 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 09:55:00PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> > Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:45:29 -0500,
> > Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Michael Koch wrote:
> > > | On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 01:13:23PM -0600, Jerry Ha
Okay from how I understand it: The classloader is not altered and must
still use Jars (since applications, like Eclipse, do override and make
their own classloader). The classloader returns a byte[] representing
the resource to the VM, which is responsible for actually running it.
THe GCJ stuff tak
Hi,
On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 21:30 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> We can decide to pubild only some archs to native. E.g. native libs for
> Eclipse
> make little sense on arm.
Why does it make less sense on arm then on any of the other
architectures?
Cheers,
Mark
signature.asc
Description: This i
I have no idea what Ubuntu is going to do, as I ran out of time to do
it. I will assuradly do what Debian does, so I'm here to influence
Debian's decision. ;). Either way, I think bcabi is a stupid name. Even
spelled out it doesn't say anything "binary compatible application
binary interface". Bina
> "Michael" == Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I read some mails about the location of the classmap.db file on the
>> Fedora mailing list[1], thanks to Mark. Is it possible to specify a
>> directory where we could put all the db files and gij could resolve the
>> mapping using the
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 09:28:49PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> 29 Apr 2005 12:32:12 -0600,
> Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> "Arnaud" == Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >>> If you follow the typical BC comp
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 10:00:54PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> About the archive space, don't forget you have to multiple the space by
> the number of different arches (12 or so)!..
We can decide to pubild only some archs to native. E.g. native libs for Eclipse
make little sense on arm.
Mich
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 09:55:00PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:45:29 -0500,
> Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Michael Koch wrote:
> > | On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 01:13:23PM -0600, Jerry Haltom wrote:
> > [...]
> > |>I would like to name the secondary native pa
Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:35:56 +0100,
Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 09:24:30AM -0500, Barry Hawkins wrote:
[...]
>> Iterpreted languages hardly need me to back them up, but I think they
>> have a proven track record. Taking one of the leading interpreted
>> lang
Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:45:29 -0500,
Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Koch wrote:
> | On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 01:13:23PM -0600, Jerry Haltom wrote:
> [...]
> |>I would like to name the secondary native packages with a -jbi prefix
> |>(Java Binary Interface). Some people like the na
Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:14:58 +0100,
Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I would like to name the secondary native packages with a -jbi prefix
>> (Java Binary Interface). Some people like the name -bcabi because that
>> is what the GCJ folks tend to refer to it as. BC ABI: Binary Compatible
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
29 Apr 2005 12:32:12 -0600,
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Arnaud" == Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> If you follow the typical BC compilation approach, libgcj won't care
>>> what the so files are called.
>
> Arnaud>
Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:18:57 +0200,
Wolfgang Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, the debian/control.in feature of cdbs should not be used as we have
> heard yesterday:
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-java-maintainers/2005-April/003273.html
My fault! Sorry.
--
.''`.
: :' :rn
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 01:15:04PM -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote:
> I mean as part of the arch-dep process. THe arch-dep process requires a
> complete build, simply excluding everything else from the package.
>
> Of course the jars are still required. They have things in them other
> than .class files
I mean as part of the arch-dep process. THe arch-dep process requires a
complete build, simply excluding everything else from the package.
Of course the jars are still required. They have things in them other
than .class files.
On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 08:49 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Fri, Apr
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:42:08PM -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote:
> > I'm not in favour of compiling on the user machine. Also, don't forget
> > if the package is well done, only the native part will be compiled, the
> > jars are arch-indep so they'll not be re-compiled by the buildd's.
>
> How so?
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
