-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Debian Java,
~I had originally planned to send this message only to
pkg-java-maintainers, but I believe this issue is broader in context and
thus should have input from the debian-java list.
~The current usage of alternatives for common java exe
Robert Lougher gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hi Dalibor,
>
> Dalibor Topic kaffe.org> writes:
>
> > Kaffe uses its own sysdepCallMethod code but can also use libffi as an
> > additional option. See config/$arch/sysdepCallMethod.h for details. See
> > config/sysdepCallMethod-ffi.h for the wrapper for
Michael Koch gmx.de> writes:
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 02:39:19PM +, Robert Lougher wrote:
> > Michael Koch gmx.de> writes:
> >
> >
> > > Please don't use jamvm in general. It's only available on i386, powerpc
> > > and arm. It's not ported yet to other archs and Porting to 64-bit archs
Hi
www.java2s.com organizes Java resources into catgegories. Now it
has
thousands of pure Java products, hundreds of Java articles and tons
of Java examples
indexed by screenshots.
Joe Yin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Wolfgang Baer wrote:
Yes, I read a bit of this thread - but I think that was (only) for some
packages. As I remember the w3c package (the problem for xalan2) was
one of the packages mentioned.
Yeah. I though endorsed override would only work for some selected
packages anyway, though.
Better a wo
Hi Dalibor,
Dalibor Topic kaffe.org> writes:
> Kaffe uses its own sysdepCallMethod code but can also use libffi as an
> additional option. See config/$arch/sysdepCallMethod.h for details. See
> config/sysdepCallMethod-ffi.h for the wrapper for ffi. Feel free to merge it
> into JamVM, if you thin
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 05:40:22PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
>
> From: Robert Lougher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Wolfgang Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:08:49 +
> Subject: Re: libbsf-java
>
> Hi again,
>
> > The statement of better choice is here maybe a bit out of co
Dalibor Topic wrote:
Wolfgang Baer gmx.de> writes:
Hi all,
Therefore the first question:
Are any of the free vm's capable of using the -Djava.endorsed.dirs
feature to overwrite the interfaces ?
Not yet, afaik. Gcjers are working on it, I plan to follow what they do, but
haven't been following th
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 05:47:27PM +, Robert Lougher wrote:
> Wolfgang Baer gmx.de> writes:
> >
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > That is just because of the debian policy which states that a package
> > must be buildable from source on all debian arches. As jamvm is
> > currently not available on all a
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 02:39:19PM +, Robert Lougher wrote:
> Michael Koch gmx.de> writes:
>
>
> > Please don't use jamvm in general. It's only available on i386, powerpc
> > and arm. It's not ported yet to other archs and Porting to 64-bit archs
> > is hard due to the 32-bit ugliness in the
Wolfgang Baer gmx.de> writes:
> The difficulty (once 64-bit support is done) with porting JamVM to
> these architectures is the calling convention. Other VMs (e.g.
> SableVM) rely on libffi to do this portably. I prefer to instead use
> hand-coded routines for each architecture/platform (using
Wolfgang Baer gmx.de> writes:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Therefore the first question:
>
> Are any of the free vm's capable of using the -Djava.endorsed.dirs
> feature to overwrite the interfaces ?
Not yet, afaik. Gcjers are working on it, I plan to follow what they do, but
haven't been following the di
Wolfgang Baer gmx.de> writes:
>
> Dalibor Topic wrote:
> > Wolfgang Baer gmx.de> writes:
> >
> >
> >>But, kaffe is atm horrible broken for most package builds due to
> >>bug (#295014). Every second package fails due to this bug to build.
> >>libbsf-java is one of them thats why I had to switc
Wolfgang Baer gmx.de> writes:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> That is just because of the debian policy which states that a package
> must be buildable from source on all debian arches. As jamvm is
> currently not available on all arches the consequence is that if
> I use jamvm for BUILDING my package on i386
Robert Lougher gmail.com> writes:
>
> Michael Koch gmx.de> writes:
>
> > Please don't use jamvm in general. It's only available on i386,
powerpc
> > and arm. It's not ported yet to other archs and Porting to 64-bit
archs
> > is hard due to the 32-bit ugliness in the upstream code.
> >
> > B
Dalibor Topic wrote:
Wolfgang Baer gmx.de> writes:
But, kaffe is atm horrible broken for most package builds due to
bug (#295014). Every second package fails due to this bug to build.
libbsf-java is one of them thats why I had to switch. I already
contacted upstream but didn't get any response so
Wolfgang Baer gmx.de> writes:
> But, kaffe is atm horrible broken for most package builds due to
> bug (#295014). Every second package fails due to this bug to build.
> libbsf-java is one of them thats why I had to switch. I already
> contacted upstream but didn't get any response so far.
I gues
--- Begin Message ---
Hi again,
> The statement of better choice is here maybe a bit out of context. gij,
> kaffe or sablevm are in the case of using the vm to BUILD a package for
> DEBIAN the (normally) only choice. But that has nothing to do with
> the quality or fitness for a given task of jam
Hi Robert,
Robert Lougher wrote:
Michael Koch gmx.de> writes:
Please don't use jamvm in general. It's only available on i386, powerpc
and arm. It's not ported yet to other archs and Porting to 64-bit archs
is hard due to the 32-bit ugliness in the upstream code.
Better choices are gij, kaffe or s
Michael Koch gmx.de> writes:
> Please don't use jamvm in general. It's only available on i386, powerpc
> and arm. It's not ported yet to other archs and Porting to 64-bit archs
> is hard due to the 32-bit ugliness in the upstream code.
>
> Better choices are gij, kaffe or sablevm.
>
And with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wolfgang Baer wrote:
| Forgot to post to list .
|
| Michael Koch wrote:
|
|> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 08:36:17AM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
|
|
| [...]
|
|> Please don't use jamvm in general. It's only available on i386, powerpc
|> and arm. It's not
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 10:36 +0100, Fred wrote:
> Are there any eclipse 3.0 packages for debian ?
Yip, Jerry's source packages are on mentors.debian.net
See: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/e/eclipse/
--
Thomas Fogwill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
This message has been scanned for vir
Hi,
Are there any eclipse 3.0 packages for debian ?
Fred.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Michael,
I also post to list - my fault as I forget to post to list
in last message.
Michael Koch wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 09:11:02AM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
Michael Koch wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 08:36:17AM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
[...]
Please don't use jamvm in general. It'
Forgot to post to list .
Michael Koch wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 08:36:17AM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
[...]
Please don't use jamvm in general. It's only available on i386, powerpc
and arm. It's not ported yet to other archs and Porting to 64-bit archs
is hard due to the 32-bit ugliness in
25 matches
Mail list logo
