Yes definitely. However, using /usr/share/javadoc would put us in line
with JPackage. And I think it's a good idea too. Even if we link
from /usr/share/javadoc to /usr/share/doc/package/api.
On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 00:28 -0500, Barry Hawkins wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jerry Haltom wrote:
| I had a bright idea for our Java policy which I want to discuss:
| installing all javadoc in a centralized location and linking it
| together.
[...]
Jerry,
~I believe we can link to dependent APIs without using a centralized
lo
I had a bright idea for our Java policy which I want to discuss:
installing all javadoc in a centralized location and linking it
together.
What this would do is let a user pop open a web browser and see javadoc
for every page he has installed, and browse between packages seamlessly.
JPackage stan
Attention Java Maintainers: This Effects You
This is a recap of an ad-hoc discussion a number of Java maintainers had
a few minutes ago in #debian-java concerning our direction with regards
to including native GCJ compiled Jar files in our packages.
Brief overview: gcj-4.0 is now in experimental
Disregard this. I accidentally hit send. I am still finishing it. =(
On Sat, 2005-03-12 at 13:04 -0600, Jerry Haltom wrote:
> Attention Java Maintainers: This Effects You
>
>
> This is a recap of an ad-hoc discussion a number of Java maintainers had
> a few minutes ago in #debian-java concerning
Attention Java Maintainers: This Effects You
This is a recap of an ad-hoc discussion a number of Java maintainers had
a few minutes ago in #debian-java concerning our direction with regards
to including native GCJ compiled Jar files in our packages.
Brief overview: gcj-4.0 is now in experimental
6 matches
Mail list logo
