Re: gcj4 changes : Please Comment

2005-02-27 Thread Daniel Bonniot
2) There is a middle ground position which would be to provide natively compiled version of a few select applications. Eclipse comes immediately to my mind, Daniele mentioned Tomcat. The question is, to we want that for any single java library in Debian? If not, where do we draw the line? That is

Re: gcj4 changes : Please Comment

2005-02-27 Thread Michael Koch
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 10:32:41AM +0100, Daniel Bonniot wrote: > > I hear the arguments for providing natively compiled versions too. This looks > like it's not going to be a clear cut choice. A few thoughts: > > 1) There is a kind of parallel with other languages in Debian. I think of at > le

Re: [dsi-list] Re: Looking for the right Java solution

2005-02-27 Thread Daniel Bonniot
Well then, I'll try to go my way using the free alternatives. Eventually I'll send in some feedback if something should not work as expected. That's the spirit! Thanks. Daniel -- The Nice programming language: http://nice.sf.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsub

Re: gcj4 changes : Please Comment

2005-02-27 Thread Daniel Bonniot
I hear the arguments for providing natively compiled versions too. This looks like it's not going to be a clear cut choice. A few thoughts: 1) There is a kind of parallel with other languages in Debian. I think of at least python and emacs-lisp. If I understand correctly, modules in these langu