On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 07:40:33PM +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> What is the "official" opinion of the Java maintainers on what the
> proper Depends should be in such a situation (even if it might hurt you
> to have an opinion on non-free software :> )?
I don't know how authorite I can speak here
Hello,
I've started packaging the next version of FreeMind and, despite my lack
of Java knowledge, I've noticed that the new version is coming with
quite a lot of standard Java libraries (i.e. libraries already packaged
elsewhere in Debian), roughly libcommons-lang-java,
librelaxng-datatype-jav
Hi,
I'm maintaining the freemind package (nice software), which
doesn't work with free implementations (yes, yes, I know, why and all
this kind of thing; let's say it's not a priority for upstream and my
Java knowledge is near to 0).
Anyway, I'm facing something which I thought would be an FAQ
This is very odd. Do you mind doing some debugging?
The rules file is breaking at about line 586... during the step that
builds the GCJ natives for every plugin file.
The line looks like this:
/usr/bin/gcj-4.0 -Wl,-Bsymbolic -shared -fPIC -fjni -findirect-dispatch
\
-o $(
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 04:34:26PM +, John Patterson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running a Debian stable system with a few packages from unstable thrown
> in
> for good measure. I am trying to run java-package but it complains bails out
> with this message:
>
> Detected product:
> Java(TM) So
5 matches
Mail list logo
