Re: Eclipse 3.0

2005-01-05 Thread Grzegorz B. Prokopski
On Wed, 2005-05-01 at 18:03 +0100, Michael Koch wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2005 17:55 schrieb Grzegorz B. Prokopski: > > On Wed, 2005-05-01 at 17:40 +0100, Michael Koch wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2005 17:29 schrieb Jerry Haltom: > > > > Does that provide the command line "ant"? Doesn'

Re: Eclipse 3.0

2005-01-05 Thread Barry Hawkins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Arnaud Vandyck wrote: | Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:55:44 -0600, | Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] | | IMHO it's a waste of time. That's why I won't investigate. I don't see | swt for !x86 arches... am I wrong? ~We would have to build the SWT

Re: Eclipse 3.0

2005-01-05 Thread Michael Koch
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2005 21:55 schrieb Jerry Haltom: > What are the potential issues with using SwingWT for our Swing > implementation in the meantime? If it can be made to work, anyways. SwingWT is just no Swing replacement just similar to it. Its bases on SWT while Swing is based on AWT. The

Re: Eclipse 3.0

2005-01-05 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:55:44 -0600, Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What are the potential issues with using SwingWT for our Swing > implementation in the meantime? If it can be made to work, anyways. IMHO it's a waste of time. That's why I won't investigate. I don't see swt for !x86 arc

Re: Eclipse 3.0

2005-01-05 Thread Jerry Haltom
What are the potential issues with using SwingWT for our Swing implementation in the meantime? If it can be made to work, anyways. On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 18:03 +0100, Michael Koch wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2005 17:55 schrieb Grzegorz B. Prokopski: > > On Wed, 2005-05-01 at 17:40 +0100, Michae

Re: Eclipse 3.0

2005-01-05 Thread Grzegorz B. Prokopski
On Wed, 2005-05-01 at 17:40 +0100, Michael Koch wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2005 17:29 schrieb Jerry Haltom: > > Does that provide the command line "ant"? Doesn't look like it. > > No, but its too easy to write it yourself: Actually why not have an "ant-free" script in /usr/bin: (libant1.6-ja

Re: Eclipse 3.0

2005-01-05 Thread Michael Koch
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2005 17:55 schrieb Grzegorz B. Prokopski: > On Wed, 2005-05-01 at 17:40 +0100, Michael Koch wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2005 17:29 schrieb Jerry Haltom: > > > Does that provide the command line "ant"? Doesn't look like it. > > > > No, but its too easy to write it yourse

Re: Eclipse 3.0

2005-01-05 Thread Jerry Haltom
Does that provide the command line "ant"? Doesn't look like it. On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 06:02 +0100, Michael Koch wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2005 00:20 schrieb Jerry Haltom: > > Does anybody have anything to work with on this? It seems that it > > may have inadvertently become a blocker for Ant

Re: Eclipse 3.0

2005-01-05 Thread Michael Koch
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2005 17:29 schrieb Jerry Haltom: > Does that provide the command line "ant"? Doesn't look like it. No, but its too easy to write it yourself: #!/bin/sh export ANT_HOME=/usr/share/ant1.6 export JAVACMD=kaffe $JAVACMD -classpath $ANT_HOME/lib/ant.jar: $ANT_HOME/lib/ant-laun

Re: Eclipse 3.0

2005-01-05 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:02:43 +0100, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2005 00:20 schrieb Jerry Haltom: >> Does anybody have anything to work with on this? It seems that it >> may have inadvertently become a blocker for Ant in main. :0 >> >> I've been trying to figure o