On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 10:17, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> I read the subject of this mail nearly twice a week or more and I
> hesitate to answer or not. I doubt because this bug report raise another
> question: does Debian support non-free JDK?
>
> I'd like to answer NO! But there is something schi
Hi.
So our users seems to need JDK1.5 (or should I call it JDK5.0?) but
it's clear it's not free software at all! Also, if we support non free
JDK's, I doubt people will test free JVM's and file bug reports against
them (and that's what we need more: this simple test case works with non
free JVM,
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:17:07 +0100, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So our users seems to need JDK1.5 (or should I call it JDK5.0?) but
> it's clear it's not free software at all! Also, if we support non free
> JDK's, I doubt people will test free JVM's and file bug reports against
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sun, 26 Sep 2004 23:56:16 +0200,
Simon Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it seems that 'ant test-reports' does not work with JDK 1.5.
>
> $ java -version
> java version "1.5.0-beta"
> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0-b
Hi,
sorry for getting back to you all so late, I am currently writing my diploma
thesis which leaves not much time for eclipse. As you already may have
noticed an pkg-eclipse project has been set up on alioth. If you want to
participate write me and I'll add you to the project. I will then join
This thread begs for me to write something -- and I tried to do so,
three times, but each response came out sounding like a fight; I am at
a loss for words. Therefore I will only ask:
Are hopes for a SUN JavaVM on Debian badly mis-placed?
--
WC -Sx- Jones
http://insecurity.org/
6 matches
Mail list logo
