Re: apt and java

Omry Yadan inter.net.il> writes: > >Making Java and Debian closer is simple: use free runtimes, report bugs & > >help us make them better than Sun's Java implementation is all respects that > > you care about. > > > > > > This approach is costing Debian users many good java programs which rel

Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machine for Java

Johan Walles wrote: -Original Message- " This represents "Management Information System." This is generally a system based on a mainframe or minicomputer. Some companies have a department labeled "MIS" that may serve various puposes in the company, generally networking related. " Thanks

Re: GPL related question

Let me get this straight: You are going to take somebody else's code without reading and consenting to the license agreement that they placed on their code? Read the license. If you do not consent to it, do not use the code. Period.

Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machine for Java

ï-Original Message- From: Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: debian-java@lists.debian.org Sent: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 15:13:03 +0200 Subject: Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machine for Java Johan Walles wrote: "2 (iii) Distributor may modify the Software i

Re: RFP: jrockit -- A virtual machine for Java

Johan Walles wrote: I've attached the re-distribution license agreement to the RFP at "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=273693";. It's in MS Word format, but it opens fine in OpenOffice. Argh. It's a software license. There is no need to make MS Word files out of it, afaict. Sig

Re: Confusion, java-package or mpkg-j2se?

> On another note, is it possible we could see the > ${vendor}-j2{re,sdk}${version}debian packages included in Debian? Their > Debian integration features are the main reason I use > j2se-package/java-package. Perhaps we could even have these features > rolled into the generated ${vendor}-j2{re