Re: Question about java-virtual-machine

2004-08-31 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 04:12, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote: > Not sure it's a good idea. Given that the "java-virtual-machine" > dependency was created to accomodate the properties shared among > the JVMs and that most of JVMs, in general, is capable of running > JNI code, running a JNI code is

Java alternatives

2004-08-31 Thread Jerry Haltom
I've noticed java, javac, javap, javah, jar, jarsigner, and all the others, are separate alternatives. I was thinking (experiencing) that this make it awfully hard to change your default VM, as you have to change each one of these commands. You may miss one, and then, while building something may b

[MailServer Notification] Attention ! Virus detecté !

2004-08-31 Thread System Attendant
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange took action on the message. The message details were: Sender = debian-java@lists.debian.org Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Subject = Mail Delivery (failure [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Scanning time = 08/31/2004 14:48:29 Engine/Pattern = 7.000-1004/2.162.00 Action taken

Re: Question about java-virtual-machine

2004-08-31 Thread Ricky Clarkson
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:50:54 +0200, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:12:28 -0400, > "Grzegorz B. Prokopski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > PS: When Sarge is finally released shouldn't we think about renaming > >

Re: Question about java-virtual-machine

2004-08-31 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:12:28 -0400, "Grzegorz B. Prokopski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > PS: When Sarge is finally released shouldn't we think about renaming > java-runtime to something like free-java-runtime and java2-runtime to > something like non-f