eManager Notification *
The following mail was blocked since it contains sensitive content.
Source mailbox: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Policy: Attachment Removal
Attachment file name: application.pif - application/octet-stream
A
On Monday 05 April 2004 11:49, James Troup wrote:
> a) First of all there are several trivial lintian/linda errors, please
>clean these up before re-uploading.
ACK
> b) Is kaffe-dev really arch: all? Also how come nothing Depends,
>Recommends or even Suggests it?
This package is only fo
> > Basically, the source of the Bouncy Castle Crypto libraries is
> > freely available, however the library jar file is signed by Bouncy
> > Castle, which is necessary for its use as a Java security provider.
>
> Bad.
>
> > As far as I can tell, in creating a Java library package, I want to
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Basically, the source of the Bouncy Castle Crypto libraries is freely
> available, however the library jar file is signed by Bouncy Castle,
> which is necessary for its use as a Java security provider.
Bad.
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Charles Fry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I sent this to debian-mentors with no response yet, and started thinking
> maybe I should send it to debian-java instead. In any case:
>
> I have started work on packaging the Bouncy Castle Crypto libraries
> for Java (bug #234048). I think I have m
Achim Derigs wrote:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 05:54:48PM +0200, Thomas Jachmann wrote:
Hi,
I've got an Apache->Tomcat->Jboss setup on a Debian woody production box
(Sun JVM 1.4.2_01). Three weeks ago, Tomcat stopped working printing an
exception stating that there are too many open files. After res
Hi,
I sent this to debian-mentors with no response yet, and started thinking
maybe I should send it to debian-java instead. In any case:
I have started work on packaging the Bouncy Castle Crypto libraries
for Java (bug #234048). I think I have most everything in place for a
first stab, but I can'
Hello,
allow me to hightlight a new online poll on the DevX
Developer site front page that asks: "Should Sun
distribute an open source version of Java with IBM, as
Big Blue suggested in its open letter?"
Answers include:
* No way. It'll just fragment Java even more.
* Definitely. The
8 matches
Mail list logo