I still think that ant should stop depending on jython and antlr,
since that's a policy violation (depends on non-necessary packages)
and brings
I agree with the first part, but not the second (i.e. IMHO it's not a
Policy violation). But the latest Ant package (uploaded yesterday) does
not d
Well, we got ant, ant1.5 and ant1.6 and maybe the plugins could exist
for the three different ant...
What is the rationale for /usr/share/ant1.X/lib ? Is it designed for
plugins that would only work with a certain version of ant?
what happens if you don't have ant1.6 but
already have a lot of p
Hallo Daniel,
* Daniel Bonniot wrote:
>As others have stated, eclipse handles pretty sensitive data (sources),
>so being
>conservative is appropriate.
I also agree with this opinion, so eclipse will stay out of main for
the next time.
Anybody willing to do a PPC upload? I have a bugreport, whi
Daniel Bonniot wrote:
Maybe we should discuss on that. Maybe it's good but I think we should
have a common way of doing it.
No need to discuss this. :-)
Just do it like the other packages do it already: Put your JAR with Ant
tasks (or a symlink to the JAR) in /usr/share/ant/lib.
I still think t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Salut Arnaud,
Bien le bonjour ;-)
>>>What I do (in the package 'nice') is to setup a symlink from
>>>/usr/share/ant/lib/nice.jar to the jar containing the actual plugin.
>> Maybe we should discuss on that
Since the 1.1.4 release of kaffe, eclipse runs reasonable well with
kaffe.
Good news!
Reasonable well means, that I successfully did some java coding
with it. I couldn't call it very good, since the second editor (XML
plugin) I tryed to open crashed the whole thing.
So what is the treeshold (sp?)
Salut Arnaud,
What I do (in the package 'nice') is to setup a symlink from
/usr/share/ant/lib/nice.jar to the jar containing the actual plugin.
Maybe we should discuss on that. Maybe it's good but I think we should
have a common way of doing it.
Agreed.
Maybe a shell script update-antlib or som
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Philipp,
(please, respect the mail-followup-to field ;-) even if doogie and
dalibor don't, they are some kind of rebel! ;-)
Philipp Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Arnaud Vandyck schrieb:
>> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>>These
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Adam Heath wrote:
> components/content/lib/velocity-dep-1.3.jar
This is part of a subproject of velocity, velocity-tools.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Is there a standard Debian way to add ant plugins libraries?
>
> I don't think this is documented anywhere.
>
> What I do (in the package 'nice') is to setup a symlink from
> /usr/share/ant/lib/nice.jar to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Since the 1.1.4 release of kaffe, eclipse runs reasonable well with
>> kaffe. Reasonable well means, that I successfully did some java coding
>> with it. I couldn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> If the things continue at this pace, we may consider doing kaffe-cvs
>> releases more regularly for interested people to play with.
>
> I for one would love that.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Badran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 10 Mar 2004 16:04, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>> > components/service/lib/jaxrpc.jar
>>
>> I think I already see this somewhere ;-)... (but where?)
>
> Isnt this a library from j2ee?
Done!
http://java
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joe Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I packaged an old version of jboss (3.0.2 or something)[1] and had
> intentions of doing 3.1+. I found it quite a bit of work to do the
> packaging alone and deal with all the dependencies embedded within th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Caoilte O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How complex is the manual install for debian now?
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/installmanual
> I looked at the Redhat pages a while back but there were
> just too many steps involved even befo
Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since the 1.1.4 release of kaffe, eclipse runs reasonable well with
> kaffe. Reasonable well means, that I successfully did some java coding
> with it. I couldn't call it very good, since the second editor (XML
> plugin) I tryed to open crashed the whole thi
Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If the things continue at this pace, we may consider doing kaffe-cvs
> releases more regularly for interested people to play with.
I for one would love that.
--
* Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) *
* PGP
Hej.Civilization is a limitless multiplication of unnecessary necessities.
Debian, looking for a site to purchase medicatiAUon?Supreme ViagGbra and CialMhis.
Fast weight (benedictionary ocreae) loss and anti depressant medicatijLon!Best price on ValiuWVm and XanaIfx.
Best deals, 80 pcerent off!W
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> >
> >> Would be cool to have JBoss in Debian ;-)
> >
> > Don't you mean ofbiz(altho, jboss would be nice too, but jboss
> > upstream isn't friendly).
>
> >From the
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>
>> Would be cool to have JBoss in Debian ;-)
>
> Don't you mean ofbiz(altho, jboss would be nice too, but jboss
> upstream isn't friendly).
>From the website, it seems jboss is used by ofbiz! ;-)...
But I don't
elijah wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Would be cool to have JBoss in Debian ;-)
>>
>> As soon as Kaffe runs JBoss (even rudimentally) I will package JBoss
>> for Debian, unless somebody else beats me to it (I don't see a need
>> to package it before that as the installation to /usr/local
Hallo Arnaud,
* Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>Would be cool to have JBoss in Debian ;-)
NTW: JPackage has packaged JBoss, so why not have a look there :) Its
kind of fun, as well, as it is interesting, what kind of features
other packages have. So far I've found 4 different eclipse packages:
JPackage, g
I've reduced the list, to those that implement java extensions.
jdbc2_0-stdext and jta appear to be in kaffe in some form or another.
> components/minerva/lib/jdbc2_0-stdext.jar
javax.sql.*
> components/minerva/lib/jta_1.0.1.jar
javax.transaction.*
> components/minerva/lib/ots-jts_1.0.jar
o
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> I don't know about the rest from the top of my head. I'm checking in
> some RMI improvements now, and then we'll give JBoss a beating. The
> developement in the last few days has been quite intensive wrt to
> getting XScale, PowerPC-no-fpu, and MIPS to r
Is there a standard Debian way to add ant plugins libraries?
I don't think this is documented anywhere.
What I do (in the package 'nice') is to setup a symlink from
/usr/share/ant/lib/nice.jar to the jar containing the actual plugin.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
These are the jars I need to have packaged still.
Slightly smaller list, as I found some replacements in debian already.
Re-ordered:
1° Maybe already in Debian:
components/content/lib/iText.jar
libitext-java - Java Library to gener
How complex is the manual install for debian now?
I looked at the Redhat pages a while back but there were
just too many steps involved even before you try on a
debian system.
c
On Tuesday 02 March 2004 22:44, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the report!
>
> On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 16:5
On 10 Mar 2004, Joe Phillips wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 11:39, elijah wright wrote:
> >
> > i'm pretty sure someone already built jboss packages - i seem to have an
> > apt-get source for them already, at least
>
> I packaged an old version of jboss (3.0.2 or something)[1] and had
> intent
Hello,
Since the 1.1.4 release of kaffe, eclipse runs reasonable well with
kaffe. Reasonable well means, that I successfully did some java coding
with it. I couldn't call it very good, since the second editor (XML
plugin) I tryed to open crashed the whole thing.
So what is the treeshold (sp?) to
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 11:39, elijah wright wrote:
>
> i'm pretty sure someone already built jboss packages - i seem to have an
> apt-get source for them already, at least
I packaged an old version of jboss (3.0.2 or something)[1] and had
intentions of doing 3.1+. I found it quite a bit of wo
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, elijah wright wrote:
>
> i'm pretty sure someone already built jboss packages - i seem to have an
> apt-get source for them already, at least
>
> elijah
That was me, but was based on 2.4. 3.0 changed completely around, and I never
got around to it.
Plus, we have stopped
i'm pretty sure someone already built jboss packages - i seem to have an
apt-get source for them already, at least
elijah
> > Would be cool to have JBoss in Debian ;-)
>
> As soon as Kaffe runs JBoss (even rudimentally) I will package JBoss for
> Debian, unless somebody else beats me to it
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > These are the jars I need to have packaged still.
> > Slightly smaller list, as I found some replacements in debian already.
>
> Re-ordered:
>
> 1° Maybe already in Debian:
>
> > components/content/lib/iText.
On Wednesday 10 Mar 2004 16:04, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> > components/service/lib/jaxrpc.jar
>
> I think I already see this somewhere ;-)... (but where?)
Isnt this a library from j2ee?
Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO
Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would be cool to have JBoss in Debian ;-)
As soon as Kaffe runs JBoss (even rudimentally) I will package JBoss
for Debian, unless somebody else beats me to it (I don't see a need to
package it before that as the installation to /usr/local or /var/jboss
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> These are the jars I need to have packaged still.
> Slightly smaller list, as I found some replacements in debian already.
Re-ordered:
1° Maybe already in Debian:
> components/content/lib/iText.jar
libitext-java - Java Library to generate PDF on the Fly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> These classes in ant-launcher.jar automatically include all JARs in
> {ant.home}/lib which was previously done my my startup script. So I'm
> now using upstream's startup scripts since this is not needed any
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
I do not follow the ant-dev mailing list, but I'd like to know what is
the ant-launcher.jar? And what is the startup script?
ant-launcher.jar contains classes to set up Ant's class path. It is now
the preferred way to start Ant using
org.apache.tools.ant.launch.Launcher fro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Badran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This seems a really nice way to get an awt/swing implementation that
> already works with gij, has anyone looked at implementing it in
> debian and possibly getting a shed load more packages from
> contrib->m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:47:53 +0100
> Source: ant
> Version: 1.6.1-1
[...]
>* Use upstream's version of the Ant wrapper /usr/bin/ant which uses the
> new ant-launcher.jar
Hi Stefan,
First of al
40 matches
Mail list logo
