Re: Sad news for Kaffe.

Nic Ferrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ean Schuessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Dear self-rightous and non-appreciative Java Debian list, >> ... > > You should all start using lisp. I've just started to read the (info "(elisp) Top") ;-) Good to hear you Nic ;-) -- .''`. : :' :rna

Re: Re: Your archive

Chère Cliente, Cher Client, Merci de nous avoir contactés. Vous venez d'envoyer un message à une adresse ne permettant pas de recevoir d'e-mail. - Pour changer votre adresse mail ou vos coordonnées personnelles, cliquez sur https://www.fnac.com/account/profil/AccountInfos.asp Si vous souhaite

Re: Sad news for Kaffe.

Ean Schuessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dear self-rightous and non-appreciative Java Debian list, > ... You should all start using lisp. Nic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

good day for kaffe 1.1.4 and ofbiz 2.1

kaffe 1.1.4 can now run ofbiz 2.1. I haven't tried a later version of ofbiz. There are some issues, however. Startup time under sun 1.4 is 11s. kaffe, 15.2. Kaffe complains about an invalid bytecode at startup, while sun doesn't. WARNING Bad bytecode! Illegal exception table entry: start_pc=1

Sad news for Kaffe.

Dear self-rightous and non-appreciative Java Debian list, After much heated discussion in the #kaffe IRC channel Arnaud and I resolved to duel each other to the death using Free Software enterprise-ready object relational ERP/CRM tools in a distributed, fault tolerant, high availability environ

Satuts of Swing and AWT in Classpath (and others) [was: Re: Report from the Debian Java developers meeting at FOSDEM]

Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, Hi, > From: Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: AWT and Swing progress > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 13:05:56 +0100 [...] > http://people.redhat.com/~graydon/free-swing-feb-09-2004.png > http://people.redhat.com/~gra

Re: Co-maintaining Kaffe

Hi, On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 23:27, Ean Schuessler wrote: > [...] we need to talk [...] Yes! And you did. Thanks for joining us last evening on #kaffe (irc.gnu.org). I am really glad that we are communicating now. > Reasonably, however, you need to acknowledge > that Arnaud's efforts to work with

Re: Co-maintaining Kaffe

Ognyan Kulev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What's your opinion about setting up pkg-kaffe project and the package > being in CVS? Done ;-) https://alioth.debian.org/mail/?group_id=1205 the cvs will soon be in place... -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Report from the Debian Java developers meeting at FOSDEM

Hi, On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 01:19, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > If Red Hat is willing to give the > work back to the community (I hope they'll do), the demo was really > good. If the promises will never be available it would be *very* > frustrating. Everything is out there

Re: Report from the Debian Java developers meeting at FOSDEM

On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 09:49:44PM +0100, Dalibor Topic wrote: > Stefan Gybas wrote: > >Main discussions with Java developers > > > >Besides the issue of better collaboration we also had a lot of technical > >discussions: > > > >- The proposed new Debian Java Policy by Jan Schulz > > That's got ti

Kaffe 1.1.4 and Tomcat4 stability

I installed the new 1.1.4 Kaffe with the hopes that it would not have the same unstability problem as 1.1.3 has on my home server. Unfortunately again after running fine for two days the Tomcat4 stops responding. Here is the telnet trace: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ telnet localhost 8180 Trying 127.0.0.1

Re: Co-maintaining Kaffe

Hi Ean, Ean Schuessler wrote: Hi Dalibor, I regret that I wasn't at FOSDEM with you, but I was inconveniently in America at the time. I'll also agree that we haven't had many email discussions but I do think that every one we have had has been initiated by me. But finger pointing isn't product

Re: Co-maintaining Kaffe

Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I really, really think that we need to have some sort of a proper > process for this type of thing without people getting pissed off. This > process should also be put in the debian policy; a sort of a virtual Actually we do have this. You want either Techi