Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Again, I deeply appreciate your work but I admonish you to follow
procedure or I will take this up with Project leadership.
I do not appreciate the way you deal with the situation. Sending this
mail to the public list before even trying to talk with me is not a way
to p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ean Schuessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Arnaud,
Hi Ean,
> First, I would like to start by saying how much I appreciate your
> enthusiasm and all of the hard work you are putting into Kaffe. I
> think that your efforts are definitely produc
* eManager Notification **
A potentially dangerous attachment has been detected.
Source mailbox: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Policy: Replaced with text
Attachment file name: doc.zip - application/x-zip-compressed
Action: Attachment Remova
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hopefully the gcj 3.4 release will be able to run Eclipse interpreted
> through gij out of the box (that is not very fast, but not as slow as
> you would think). That doesn't solve the build issue though. It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi Arnaud,
First, I would like to start by saying how much I appreciate your enthusiasm
and all of the hard work you are putting into Kaffe. I think that your
efforts are definitely producing a better product and I hope that we will be
able to work together t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
First of all, many thanks for the summary.
> Arnaud and Dalibor gave a talk about packaging Java software which
> covered JPackage (http://www.jpackage.org/), Gentoo, FreeBSD and of
> course Debian. One goal o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Main discussions with Java developers
>
> Besides the issue of better collaboration we also had a lot of
> technical discussions:
[...]
> Next steps
>
> We'll try to get more Java packages from contr
Hi,
On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 19:25, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> W liście z wto, 02-03-2004, godz. 10:54, Stefan Gybas pisze:
> [... cutting out all things that I agree with ... ]
> > - License conflicts with GPL'ed Java interpreters
> >
> >Currently Kaffe 1.1.x is the best choice for running
Hi,
Thanks for the report!
On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 16:54, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> - Native compilation
>
>Mark Wielaard and Tom Tromey showed a natively compiled version of
>Eclipse (http://www.eclipse.org) using gcj. Arnaud and I talked to
>them about packaging natively compiled softwar
W liście z wto, 02-03-2004, godz. 10:54, Stefan Gybas pisze:
[... cutting out all things that I agree with ... ]
> - License conflicts with GPL'ed Java interpreters
>
>Currently Kaffe 1.1.x is the best choice for running Java applications
>in Debian. It is, however, licensed under the GPL
The Debian project shared a developers' room at FOSDEM
(http://www.fosdem.org/) with Free Java developers so this room was
particularly interesing for Debian Java maintainers like me. I had a lot
of discussions with Grzegorz Prokopski, Arnaud Vandyck and Dalibor Topic
but also with some GNU cla
Greetings List,
Has anyone packaged libapache_mod_jk to run with the apache2 packages?
Failing this, is there an alternative to mod_jk that can be used to connect
apache2 and tomcat?
Any suggestions appreciated.
Cheers,
>From Mitchell
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
12 matches
Mail list logo
