Hallo David,
* David Walluck wrote:
>>So if 1.5 is API compatible to 1.4, the the jar should still be
>>name-1.4.jar (or at least a symlink :) But if 1.5.3 breaks something,
>>it should get name-1.5.3.jar.
>But libraries have the concept of software version, and then totally
>apart from this is t
Hallo Nicolas,
* Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>jsse.libs=$(build-classpath jsse)
>javamail.libs=$(build-classpath javamail)
>test.libs=$(build-classpath junit xerces-j2 httpunit)
^^^
I thought you don't have such a script. Thats exactly what I propose
to use, but on runtime. And
> > >For #8:
> > >We should add that all jars should have a manifest (but without
> > >Class-Path). Ant can autogenerate a manifest, or does, I forget?
> >
> > BTW: I never yet touched Manifests, what are they actually for? :)
>
> Manifests are a child of java applets. Sun needed a place to put
Le lun, 02/02/2004 à 23:28 +0100, Jan Schulz a écrit :
> Hallo David,
>
> * David Walluck wrote:
> >``Make specifying the build classpath easy using either command line
> >switches of property files (and document it).''
> >currently we use `export CLASSPATH', how does this fit in? Note that a
>
> Warning: This message has had one or more attachments removed
Command not understood: ignoring end of message.
No command found in message
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jan Schulz wrote:
IMO, they should go with the same strategy as the normal libaries:
Changing names only when a API changed.
So if 1.5 is API compatible to 1.4, the the jar should still be
name-1.4.jar (or at least a symlink :) But if 1.5.3 breaks something,
it should get name-1.5.3.jar.
This is a
Hallo Jan,
* Jan Schulz wrote:
>>``Make specifying the build classpath easy using either command line
>>switches of property files (and document it).''
>>currently we use `export CLASSPATH', how does this fit in? Note that a
>>build.xml using only properties cannot easily be used with our
>>`bui
Hallo David,
* David Walluck wrote:
>``Make specifying the build classpath easy using either command line
>switches of property files (and document it).''
>currently we use `export CLASSPATH', how does this fit in? Note that a
>build.xml using only properties cannot easily be used with our
>`bui
Eric Bruneton wrote:
I think so. I'm trying to update the ASM project to take these
guidelines into account (I attach the corresponding source package).
I think it follows items 1, 2, 3 (see build.properties), 4, 5, 6 (see
build.properties again), 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 16 & 17. Tell me if
something
The experimentalcinema.com e-mail address that you
recently sent email to, is now used only to send
occasional out-going email and is rarely, if at all,
checked for incoming.
Therefore, please send and/or resend your email(s) to
Catherine Smith, Director of Public Relations, with any
public
It would be great if maven was part of the solution, and wouldn't turn
into a road block. It has great potential in both directions, as far
as I can see it.
I completely agree with this. While I understand the griefs expressed in
this thread about Maven not playing nicely with the OS, I also th
Le lun, 02/02/2004 Ã 12:22 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a Ãcrit :
> Hallo,
>
> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > I've added a few more points that should answer your questions. Please
> > tell me if it is so (and other JPP/Debian/Gentoo... folks please check
> > if it also represents your packaging processes
Hallo,
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> I've added a few more points that should answer your questions. Please
> tell me if it is so (and other JPP/Debian/Gentoo... folks please check
> if it also represents your packaging processes)
>From some discussion on normal debian packages, I would say, that
ups
Le lun, 02/02/2004 Ã 10:26 +0100, Eric Bruneton a Ãcrit :
> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > I'm done with this. The result is available at:
> >
> > http://java.debian.net/index.php/What%20is%20required%20from%20upst
> >ream
> Thanks for these guidelines. I have a few questions:
[...]
I've added a f
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le dim, 01/02/2004 à 16:24 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
> > Le dim, 01/02/2004 à 16:15 +0100, Jan Schulz a écrit :
> > > Hallo Nicolas,
> > >
> > > * Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > > >face the same problems and wish for more or less the same
> > > > things :
> > >
> > > [..
15 matches
Mail list logo
