Re: [Fwd: Re: [architecture] Re: JPackages and ObjectWeb]

2004-02-01 Thread Dalibor Topic
David Walluck wrote: Nicolas Mailhot wrote: I'm done with this. The result is available at: It says final version is forthcoming. I was afraid to make edits just yet. And I would like to see each point numbered and lettered so that they can be easily refered to. Like we could say, ``this is

Re: [Fwd: Re: [architecture] Re: JPackages and ObjectWeb]

2004-02-01 Thread David Walluck
Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >I agree. Also it may need to be reorganised a bit (one part concerning >deps, another concerning archives, whatever). This is just a feeling btw >- I have no clear organisation in mind, if you can do it don't wait for >my approval. > I don't have a clear idea. An easy algo

Re: [Fwd: Re: [architecture] Re: JPackages and ObjectWeb]

2004-02-01 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le dim, 01/02/2004 à 12:51 -0500, David Walluck a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > >I'm done with this. The result is available at: > It says final version is forthcoming. I was afraid to make edits just > yet. Please do so now - I may fix a typo or two, but I finished my writup for today.

Re: [Fwd: Re: [architecture] Re: JPackages and ObjectWeb]

2004-02-01 Thread David Walluck
Nicolas Mailhot wrote: I'm done with this. The result is available at: It says final version is forthcoming. I was afraid to make edits just yet. And I would like to see each point numbered and lettered so that they can be easily refered to. Like we could say, ``this is a violation of IIa''

Re: [Fwd: Re: [architecture] Re: JPackages and ObjectWeb]

2004-02-01 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le dim, 01/02/2004 à 18:25 +0100, Jan Schulz a écrit : > Hallo Nicolas, > > * Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > >I'm done with this. The result is available at: > >I'm rather proud of myself since I merged the full JPP document, my > >mail, added a few ideas and corrected (a bit) the result. > > That text

Re: [Fwd: Re: [architecture] Re: JPackages and ObjectWeb]

2004-02-01 Thread Jan Schulz
Hallo Nicolas, * Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >I'm done with this. The result is available at: >I'm rather proud of myself since I merged the full JPP document, my >mail, added a few ideas and corrected (a bit) the result. That text is great! Thanks a lot for specifying the whole thing. Hoepfully some

Re: [Fwd: Re: [architecture] Re: JPackages and ObjectWeb]

2004-02-01 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le dim, 01/02/2004 à 16:24 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : > Le dim, 01/02/2004 à 16:15 +0100, Jan Schulz a écrit : > > Hallo Nicolas, > > > > * Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > >face the same problems and wish for more or less the same things : > > [...] > > > > Would you mind adding that to the wiki

Re: [Fwd: Re: [architecture] Re: JPackages and ObjectWeb]

2004-02-01 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le dim, 01/02/2004 à 16:15 +0100, Jan Schulz a écrit : > Hallo Nicolas, > > * Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > >face the same problems and wish for more or less the same things : > [...] > > Would you mind adding that to the wiki? Seems like a nice thing to > have there :) Ok (I still owe you a clarific

Re: [Fwd: Re: [architecture] Re: JPackages and ObjectWeb]

2004-02-01 Thread Jan Schulz
Hallo Nicolas, * Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >face the same problems and wish for more or less the same things : [...] Would you mind adding that to the wiki? Seems like a nice thing to have there :) Jan -- Jan Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Wer nicht fragt, bleibt dumm." -- T

Re: [Fwd: Re: [architecture] Re: JPackages and ObjectWeb]

2004-02-01 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le ven, 30/01/2004 à 09:38 -0500, David Walluck a écrit : > Eric Bruneton wrote: > >if you have precise instructions (or tutorials, or example projects) > >on how to organize Java projects, how to manage their dependencies, > >and how to build them, so that they can easily be packaged in rpm or

[Experimental] ArgoUML 0.15.2

2004-02-01 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Hi all, I've uploaded ArgoUML 0.15.2 in experimental so if you use it, you can have a try when it'll reach the pool. ATTENTION: if you want to run it at the moment, you'll need jmi.jar and make a symlink in /usr/share/java. I'll try to solve the problem as soon as possible (

Re: vCalendar, iCal Parser?

2004-02-01 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Roman Käppeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > bin auch schon ewig auf der Suche nach einem vCalendar, iCal > Parser. Leider bin ich noch nicht auf die richtige Ressource > gestoßen. Hast Du schon etwas gefunden? Vielleicht eine Bibliothek die > man in das Java-Programm einbinden kann? Hi, I do not