W liście z nie, 18-01-2004, godz. 19:41, Adam Majer pisze:
> PS. Furthermore, since these wrappers are NOT and should not be dependent
> on version of the JVM (or kaffe), they should be maintained such that
> they work with ALL the versions of the JVM. This should be simple enough :)
Speaking of
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 11:04:55PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Jikes only needs *any* version to be in testing. A given package has
> > to be removed from testing for the current problems to occur.
> > Hopefully, kaffe will get into testing by the middl
Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 12:44:34AM -0500, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
>> [*] This is completly irrelevant that jikes is currently held by
>> Kaffe. Tomorrow it may be held by SableVM, and in a week by Classpath
>> or GIJ.
>
> Jikes only needs *any* version
Hi Jan,
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004, Jan Schulz wrote:
[snip]
> I'm not sure what is happening on your system, but unfortunatelly ant
> will eat more memory than 128MB to compile eclipse. It seems that your
> kernel or anything else on the system wont let it take anything more
> than 128MB and ant gets k
Hallo Thomas,
* Thomas J. Zeeman wrote:
>First off: Juergen, thanks for the fast response!
>From me too! Finaly I can give something to my eclipse 'failed in
native code' bugs.
>With both BD 1.4.2-rc1 and Sun 1.4.2_03 it gets aborted during
>compilation, an earlier point than where BD 1.4.1 cras
W liście z nie, 18-01-2004, godz. 11:27, Arnaud Vandyck pisze:
> "Grzegorz B. Prokopski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> They do provide it. I think it's not legal. But I already told them but
> retract because I was not sure enough.
You an always ask at debian-legal first. I haven't read ALL the
l
GNU Classpath & Friends - Free Java - Fosdem 2004 program.
We now have an official program for our meeting at Fosdem 2004.
(February 21/22, Brussel)
And an official page: http://www.fosdem.org/2004/index/dev_room_java
(Abstract for all talks will be added soon to that page.)
The schedule was cons
Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 2004-01-17 at 21:29, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>
>> I did Cc: debian-legal to have a look at the license but I think it's
>> completly non-free!
>
> Not only non-free, but so bad we couldn't even put it in the non-free
> section.
>
> For example
"Grzegorz B. Prokopski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> W liÅcie z sob, 17-01-2004, godz. 21:29, Arnaud Vandyck pisze:
>>
>> I'm facing a serious problem with the ArgoUML debian package. The
>> next generation of ArgoUML (current development 0.15 and next stable
>> 0.16) will use the mdr library:
I second it too.
Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I second this proposal (reproduced below).
>
>> I propose to change the following paragraphs in section 2.3 of the
>> Debian Java policy
>>
>> > Programs must have executable(s) in /usr/bin and be executable. They
>> > can be Java classes
I second this proposal (reproduced below).
> I propose to change the following paragraphs in section 2.3 of the
> Debian Java policy
>
> > Programs must have executable(s) in /usr/bin and be executable. They
> > can be Java classes (using binfmt_misc) or wrappers. In any case,
> > they
> > must r
11 matches
Mail list logo
