Re: Java packaging

2003-12-16 Thread Jan Schulz
Hallo Daniel, * Daniel Bonniot wrote: >That's great. Will you keep both 2.1 and 3.0 in parallel in Debian, or >simply upgrade the packages to 3.0? My current planing looks like this: * split the package into at several source packages, so that swt-gtk and the eclipse compiler can go to main a

Re: Java packaging

2003-12-16 Thread Daniel Bonniot
BTW: I will try to package the eclipse 3.0 stream after the next release That's great. Will you keep both 2.1 and 3.0 in parallel in Debian, or simply upgrade the packages to 3.0? Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO

Java packaging (was: [FW] Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-5.1 (i386 source))

2003-12-16 Thread Jan Schulz
Hallo Dalibor, * Dalibor Topic wrote: >I've tried to do developement in eclipse today, and I was swearing every >5 minutes,because I found the interface to be so weird. emacs? There are keybindings for emacs... >I had a very >hard ti efiguring out what button to press where to get a CVS tree >

Re: J2SDK question

2003-12-16 Thread Jan Schulz
Hallo Marco, * Marco Bresciani wrote: >Can I use J2SDK on Debian? To install it 'the debian way', use j2se-package or mpkg-j2sdk: deb http://www.stud.uni-karlsruhe.de/~ude2 debian/ deb-src http://www.stud.uni-karlsruhe.de/~ude2 debian/ I can't recomend the Blackdown *debian* packages, at least

Re: [FW] Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-5.1 (i386 source)

2003-12-16 Thread Dalibor Topic
Hallo Jan, Jan Schulz wrote: Hallo Dalibor, * Dalibor Topic wrote: Give it a try and judge for yourself. It's not 100% stable, though, the log file shows that some things still break. But there is definitely a large improvement since 1.1.2. I haven't had a chance to do it and I think it won'

Re: [FW] Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-5.1 (i386 source)

2003-12-16 Thread Jan Schulz
Hallo Dalibor, * Dalibor Topic wrote: >>Can someone certify, that this kaffe version is able to run eclipse >>2.1.x? >It runs it quite O.K. on my box, and rather fast. But you need to add >the libswt-gtk.so directory to LD_LIBRARY_PATH. That isn'T a problem, as I do that anyway in my startscript

Re: J2SDK question

2003-12-16 Thread T. Alexander Popiel
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Marco Bresciani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Messaggio di Michael Borko del 16/12/2003: > >> hi! > >Oops... I've forgot something. :-) Sun releases the .bin file for Linux >of its J2SDK. Does it work on Debian?! Yes, though you have to install a spe

Re: J2SDK question

2003-12-16 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Michael Borko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Marco Bresciani wrote: >> Messaggio di Michael Borko del 16/12/2003: >> >> Oops... I've forgot something. :-) Sun releases the .bin file for >> Linux of its J2SDK. Does it work on Debian?! > > once upon a time i it runs on my server, i think so ... :D >

Re: J2SDK question

2003-12-16 Thread Michael Borko
Marco Bresciani wrote: Messaggio di Michael Borko del 16/12/2003: hi! Oops... I've forgot something. :-) Sun releases the .bin file for Linux of its J2SDK. Does it work on Debian?! Marco once upon a time i it runs on my server, i think so ... :D try it, and you will see... mike -- To UNSUBS

Re: J2SDK question

2003-12-16 Thread Marco Bresciani
Messaggio di Michael Borko del 16/12/2003: > hi! Oops... I've forgot something. :-) Sun releases the .bin file for Linux of its J2SDK. Does it work on Debian?! Marco -- Utente [EMAIL PROTECTED] da 3,416 anni (2018 Unità) Tempo CPU: 2,041 anni (8h 52min 28s medio) Posizione: 112020/4790396 (97,6

Re: J2SDK question

2003-12-16 Thread Marco Bresciani
Messaggio di Michael Borko del 16/12/2003: > sure, why not! :D :-) > here you have a good apt source ... > > ## JAVA - This is gcc3.2-compiled i386 release > deb http://jopa.studentenweb.org/debian ./ > deb-src http://jopa.studentenweb.org/debian ./ Thanks but... it seems it is the BlackDown ve

Re: J2SDK question

2003-12-16 Thread Michael Borko
Marco Bresciani wrote: Hello all, I've almost finished downloading Debian... I think that before year's end I'll throw away "that" ;-) operating system to use Debian and only Debian! :-) Anyway: I'm (quite) a computer science engineer and I'm using the Sun J2SDK 1.4.2 to produce my Laurea deg

J2SDK question

2003-12-16 Thread Marco Bresciani
Hello all, I've almost finished downloading Debian... I think that before year's end I'll throw away "that" ;-) operating system to use Debian and only Debian! :-) Anyway: I'm (quite) a computer science engineer and I'm using the Sun J2SDK 1.4.2 to produce my Laurea degree's software application

Re: Jpackage & JDK (Was: Re: [FW] Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-5.1 (i386 source))

2003-12-16 Thread Dalibor Topic
Ciao Allessandro, Alessandro Polverini wrote: On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 12:25, Dalibor Topic wrote: [...] Btw, how did your conversation with JPackage guys end up? They seem to have some ideas in common with with debian-java, so I was wondering if a distribution independant Java application/library

jmp-0.36 powerpc port available in Debian

2003-12-16 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Hi all, Just FYI, I've ported the jmp Debian package from Takashi Okamoto to powerpc. Thanks for his great job, nothing was needed to make it run. I tested it on a threaded swing application and it runs really great! Description: Profiler for Java to trace object and method timings. JMP is a p

Jpackage & JDK (Was: Re: [FW] Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-5.1 (i386 source))

2003-12-16 Thread Alessandro Polverini
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 12:25, Dalibor Topic wrote: [...] > Btw, how did your conversation with JPackage guys end up? They seem to > have some ideas in common with with debian-java, so I was wondering if a > distribution independant Java application/library packaging effort would > have a standin

Re: fop_0.20.5-3_powerpc.changes is NEW

2003-12-16 Thread Arnaud
FYI: Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (new) fop-doc_0.20.5-3_all.deb optional contrib/text > Documentation for fop > FOP is a print formatter driven by XSL formatting objects. > It is a Java 1.1 application that reads a formatting object > tree and then turns it into a PDF docume

Re: [FW] Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-5.1 (i386 source)

2003-12-16 Thread Dalibor Topic
Jan Schulz wrote: Hallo Ean, * Ean Schuessler wrote: I certainly thought so. I'm ready to put a 1.1.3 release in shortly. I've corrected that stupid manpath problem in my rules file. I'll look over the NMU. Were uploads broken for a while? Can someone certify, that this kaffe version is able

Re: [FW] Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-5.1 (i386 source)

2003-12-16 Thread Caoilte O'Connor
Can't verify kaffe, but I agree that the "java2-runtime" dependency is rather pointless. I need one version of JDK (compiled with gcc 3.2) for mozilla and the official sun binaries for eclipse. And as much of a mess as that is it's still more to sort out the dependencies. roll on the debian

Re: [FW] Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-5.1 (i386 source)

2003-12-16 Thread Jan Schulz
Hallo Ean, * Ean Schuessler wrote: >I certainly thought so. I'm ready to put a 1.1.3 release in shortly. I've >corrected that stupid manpath problem in my rules file. I'll look over the >NMU. Were uploads broken for a while? Can someone certify, that this kaffe version is able to run eclipse 2

Re: [FW] Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-5.1 (i386 source)

2003-12-16 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Ean Schuessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I certainly thought so. I'm ready to put a 1.1.3 release in shortly. I've > corrected that stupid manpath problem in my rules file. I'll look over the > NMU. Were uploads broken for a while? I think the queue has been down for a while. I upload to an