Re: Bug#212863: new java policy: ok or not?

Hi. > There seems to be no more questions, but unfortunatelly nonone has > said something like 'do it' or 'file bugs with patches' or 'go > testing' or whatever until now. My only comment is that since sarge is purportedly so close to freeze and since this is more or less a complete policy rewri

Bug#212863: new java policy: ok or not?

Hallo, There seems to be no more questions, but unfortunatelly nonone has said something like 'do it' or 'file bugs with patches' or 'go testing' or whatever until now. I'm a little scared to go on, and ask Stefan for the temporary inclusion of the findjava and other scripts in java-common or the

Re: Problems building and running xnap with free-java-sdk

On Tuesday 14 October 2003 15:03, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > [Please CC: me on replies, I'm not subscribed to the list] > > Hi guys, > I don't know much about java; sorry if I'm saying strange things. :) > > As in [1] and in [2] xnap fails to build and run. > > For what concerns the build step, I foun

Problems building and running xnap with free-java-sdk

[Please CC: me on replies, I'm not subscribed to the list] Hi guys, I don't know much about java; sorry if I'm saying strange things. :) As in [1] and in [2] xnap fails to build and run. For what concerns the build step, I found that with software provided by free-java-sdk and the CLASSPATH envi