Re: [PROPOSAL] 4. RfD for a new debian java policy

2003-09-14 Thread Ben Burton
Hi. Just a couple of notes re the findjava and java-config scripts. Since the proposed policy mandates that programs use both these scripts (section 2.6), I would really like to see working implementations of each of these *before* we look at making this proposal into policy. >Packages, whi

Re: [PROPOSAL] 4. RfD for a new debian java policy

2003-09-14 Thread Ben Burton
Hi. Just a couple of notes re the findjava and java-config scripts. Since the proposed policy mandates that programs use both these scripts (section 2.6), I would really like to see working implementations of each of these *before* we look at making this proposal into policy. >Packages, whi

Re: [PROPOSAL] 4. RfD for a new debian java policy

2003-09-14 Thread Jan Schulz
Hallo Dalibor, * Dalibor Topic wrote: [mention how the unfree VMs should be used] >I do not quite understand: do you simply want to list the VMs available in >debian at the time of writing, and include references to non-free VMs not in >debian? I want something so that users take one way to incl

Re: [PROPOSAL] 4. RfD for a new debian java policy

2003-09-14 Thread Dalibor Topic
Hallo Jan, --- Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to include somewhere teh naming and way to include > 'unfree' JVM, but I haven't found a proper place. I would like to make > that a little more specific, so that we only use one way to access > them (otehrwise there will be some

Re: [PROPOSAL] 4. RfD for a new debian java policy

2003-09-14 Thread Jan Schulz
Hallo Dalibor, * Dalibor Topic wrote: [mention how the unfree VMs should be used] >I do not quite understand: do you simply want to list the VMs available in >debian at the time of writing, and include references to non-free VMs not in >debian? I want something so that users take one way to incl

Re: [PROPOSAL] 4. RfD for a new debian java policy

2003-09-14 Thread Dalibor Topic
Hallo Jan, --- Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to include somewhere teh naming and way to include > 'unfree' JVM, but I haven't found a proper place. I would like to make > that a little more specific, so that we only use one way to access > them (otehrwise there will be some