-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Installing a non-debian java tar has proven to be
> quite a pain in the ass on Debian woody. I had to
> go with the tar file because IBM is the only java
> distribution that offers Java 1.4 for a Powe
Hallo wcrowshaw,
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Installing a non-debian java tar has proven to be
>quite a pain in the ass on Debian woody.
It's not only a PITA on woody...
>While I had it set up and running pretty well, my set up
>pretty much gets messed up everytime I run dselect.
Please see t
Hallo wcrowshaw,
Maybe...
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>At this point, I've lost the ability to run java by
>simply calling "java" from the CLI.
You mean it worked before you messed with dselect?
>Currently it
>complains the following:
>JVM not found: libjvm.so - libjvm.so
This looks like it c
Hallo wcrowshaw,
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Installing a non-debian java tar has proven to be
>quite a pain in the ass on Debian woody.
It's not only a PITA on woody...
>While I had it set up and running pretty well, my set up
>pretty much gets messed up everytime I run dselect.
Please see t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Installing a non-debian java tar has proven to be
> quite a pain in the ass on Debian woody. I had to
> go with the tar file because IBM is the only java
> distribution that offers Java 1.4 for a Powe
Hallo wcrowshaw,
Maybe...
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>At this point, I've lost the ability to run java by
>simply calling "java" from the CLI.
You mean it worked before you messed with dselect?
>Currently it
>complains the following:
>JVM not found: libjvm.so - libjvm.so
This looks like it c
Hallo,
This is the forth attempt of a rewrite of the current debian java
policy. The chanegs to the third version are:
* droped the 'unfree' interfaces
* dropped all the virtual package names (apart from browser plugin)
* a 'java virtual machine' is no handled by a 'findjava' script, which
wil
Installing a non-debian java tar has proven to be
quite a pain in the ass on Debian woody. I had to
go with the tar file because IBM is the only java
distribution that offers Java 1.4 for a PowerPC.
(sadly).
While I had it set up and running pretty well, my set up
pretty much gets messed up eve
Hallo,
This is the forth attempt of a rewrite of the current debian java
policy. The chanegs to the third version are:
* droped the 'unfree' interfaces
* dropped all the virtual package names (apart from browser plugin)
* a 'java virtual machine' is no handled by a 'findjava' script, which
wil
Any news about that?
Any objection if I adopt libxt-java?
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
: :' : Arnaud Vandyck
`. `' http://alioth.debian.org/users/arnaud-guest/
`-http://alioth.debian.org/developer/diary.php?diary_user=2781
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Begin Mess
Installing a non-debian java tar has proven to be
quite a pain in the ass on Debian woody. I had to
go with the tar file because IBM is the only java
distribution that offers Java 1.4 for a PowerPC.
(sadly).
While I had it set up and running pretty well, my set up
pretty much gets messed up eve
Any news about that?
Any objection if I adopt libxt-java?
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
: :' : Arnaud Vandyck
`. `' http://alioth.debian.org/users/arnaud-guest/
`-http://alioth.debian.org/developer/diary.php?diary_user=2781
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Begin Mess
12 matches
Mail list logo
