On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 00:36, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 10:16:53PM -0400, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
>
> > Package: jikes
> > Version: 1.18-6
> > Severity: wishlist
>
> Please don't CC other addresses when mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Read the BTS
> documentation about the X-
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 10:16:53PM -0400, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> Package: jikes
> Version: 1.18-6
> Severity: wishlist
Please don't CC other addresses when mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Read the BTS
documentation about the X-Debbugs-CC header.
--
- mdz
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 00:36, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 10:16:53PM -0400, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
>
> > Package: jikes
> > Version: 1.18-6
> > Severity: wishlist
>
> Please don't CC other addresses when mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Read the BTS
> documentation about the X-
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 10:16:53PM -0400, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> Package: jikes
> Version: 1.18-6
> Severity: wishlist
Please don't CC other addresses when mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Read the BTS
documentation about the X-Debbugs-CC header.
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
Package: jikes
Version: 1.18-6
Severity: wishlist
Hi all!
I used to be very busy/without net during last months but I am back.
And attacking ;-)
The problem is that currently jikes (in the sense of source package,
which is important from testing migration scripts POV) depends of
a whole pile of
> >Then why push for $JAVA_HOME, which suffers from the same problem?
>
> Because I think there are a lot of programs, which rely on the
> 'java.home' property to be set. Here is for example the result on
> going thru the ant tasks. ant is IMO one of the important packages,
> which should be made
Package: jikes
Version: 1.18-6
Severity: wishlist
Hi all!
I used to be very busy/without net during last months but I am back.
And attacking ;-)
The problem is that currently jikes (in the sense of source package,
which is important from testing migration scripts POV) depends of
a whole pile of
Hallo,
This is a significant rewrite of my previous proposal. To make
discussion alittle easier, I've broken the subject line to tell, that
this is the third request for discussion.
The changes to the second try are
* unfree interfaces are now 'additional to' the normal (free) debian
packages,
> >Then why push for $JAVA_HOME, which suffers from the same problem?
>
> Because I think there are a lot of programs, which rely on the
> 'java.home' property to be set. Here is for example the result on
> going thru the ant tasks. ant is IMO one of the important packages,
> which should be made
Hallo,
This is a significant rewrite of my previous proposal. To make
discussion alittle easier, I've broken the subject line to tell, that
this is the third request for discussion.
The changes to the second try are
* unfree interfaces are now 'additional to' the normal (free) debian
packages,
Hallo Ben,
* Ben Burton wrote:
>I'm really not sure what you mean here. At the moment, using $CLASSPATH
>is somewhat *more* portable across different JVMs than using -classpath.
>In particular, it doesn't suffer from the ever-changing command-line
>syntax, nor does it override the bootstrap class
Hallo Ben,
* Ben Burton wrote:
>I'm really not sure what you mean here. At the moment, using $CLASSPATH
>is somewhat *more* portable across different JVMs than using -classpath.
>In particular, it doesn't suffer from the ever-changing command-line
>syntax, nor does it override the bootstrap class
Hi,
Someone asked how I got native eclipse running on my Debian box and how
to get the JDT (Java Development Tools) and api documentation/code
completion tooltips work out of the box.
The following only explains how to get the needed binaries installed.
For compiling from source you will need a l
Hi,
Someone asked how I got native eclipse running on my Debian box and how
to get the JDT (Java Development Tools) and api documentation/code
completion tooltips work out of the box.
The following only explains how to get the needed binaries installed.
For compiling from source you will need a l
Recipient of the attachment: MAILSRV1, First Storage Group\Private Information
Store (MAILSRV1), Mail Admin/Inbox
Subject of the message: Re: That movie
No action was taken on the attachment.
Attachment application.pif was Logged Only for the following reasons:
Scan Engine Failure (0x8
Recipient of the attachment: MAILSRV1, First Storage Group\Private Information Store
(MAILSRV1), Mail Admin/Inbox
Subject of the message: Re: That movie
No action was taken on the attachment.
Attachment application.pif was Logged Only for the following reasons:
Scan Engine Failure (0x8
16 matches
Mail list logo
