--- Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Now that I am putting some real effort into Kaffe again I would like to
> >see an actual functioning framework of Java applications in main.
> >There is no Free VM that I am aware of that supports either Sun's 1.4 or
> >1.3 or even 1.2. Your solution
Jan Schulz wrote:
On the other hand there is this 'and our users' part in there. And
they expect, that when I install a JVM of a certain version, that all
programms, which require a JVM of that version will work.
What you presumably mean is "when I install a JVM that claims to
be compatible with
Title: Luq
Debian-java hyYTU or study? Cbq .
I'll call back! uGR B
pEieUWylXFo wait for?
hi all.
when packaging sun java 1.4.2 (probably others as well) with mpkg-j2sdk
and installing the resulting j2sdk package, mozilla/galeon stops working,
and reports this error on startup:
INTERNAL ERROR on Browser End: No manager for initializing factory?
System error?:: Success
this apperant
Hallo Dalibor,
* Dalibor Topic wrote:
>> depends:
>> java.lang.reflect.Proxy
>that seems like the most sane solution to me. List all the classes an
>application needs from the standard libs, and list all the classes a vm
>implementation provides. and then just match.
Most likely, this will brea
Hallo Daniel,
* Daniel Bonniot wrote:
>I see two options to solve this:
>1) Strict interpretation of javaN-runtime
>Indeed, probably no free JVM will be able to provide them at this point.
>However, it is still possible for packagers to make sure at least one
>free JVM works for their package, a
Title: Luq
Debian-java hyYTU or study? Cbq .
I'll call back! uGR B
pEieUWylXFo wait for?
Hallo Ean,
No need to CC me.
* Ean Schuessler wrote:
>Your scheme is sound in theory, but isn't a solution for Java under the
>Debian OS. It means that virtually all Java packages in Debian would sit
>in contrib. That's just not acceptable.
Yes, I noticed that after writing my response :(
>Now
Em Wednesday 27 August 2003 18:49, Napoleon Steward escreveu:
> Debian-java o Napoleon Steward x
>
>
> Email Advertise to 1,000,000 People - $26
>
> http://www.broadcastemailadvertise.com/email4
>
>
> 2 Debian-java 7 Napoleon Stewardyxgrgfkje y
> tgr ggqqcthpfnqyo oznjtet ft mogjvlsnqoirh lrw
> dh
hi all.
when packaging sun java 1.4.2 (probably others as well) with mpkg-j2sdk
and installing the resulting j2sdk package, mozilla/galeon stops working,
and reports this error on startup:
INTERNAL ERROR on Browser End: No manager for initializing factory?
System error?:: Success
this apper
Hi Ean,
--- Ean Schuessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and so forth... or alternatively you could use something more symbolic
> than version numbers. For instance:
>
> depends:
> java.lang.reflect.Proxy
> java.text.Bidi.reorderVisually
> java.io.ObjectOutputStream.useProtocolVersion.int
Your scheme is sound in theory, but isn't a solution for Java under the
Debian OS. It means that virtually all Java packages in Debian would sit
in contrib. That's just not acceptable.
I see two options to solve this:
1) Strict interpretation of javaN-runtime
Indeed, probably no free JVM will be
Hallo Ean,
No need to CC me.
* Ean Schuessler wrote:
>Your scheme is sound in theory, but isn't a solution for Java under the
>Debian OS. It means that virtually all Java packages in Debian would sit
>in contrib. That's just not acceptable.
Yes, I noticed that after writing my response :(
>Now
Hallo Daniel,
* Daniel Bonniot wrote:
>I see two options to solve this:
>1) Strict interpretation of javaN-runtime
>Indeed, probably no free JVM will be able to provide them at this point.
>However, it is still possible for packagers to make sure at least one
>free JVM works for their package, a
Hallo Dalibor,
* Dalibor Topic wrote:
>> depends:
>> java.lang.reflect.Proxy
>that seems like the most sane solution to me. List all the classes an
>application needs from the standard libs, and list all the classes a vm
>implementation provides. and then just match.
Most likely, this will brea
Em Wednesday 27 August 2003 18:49, Napoleon Steward escreveu:
> Debian-java o Napoleon Steward x
>
>
> Email Advertise to 1,000,000 People - $26
>
> http://www.broadcastemailadvertise.com/email4
>
>
> 2 Debian-java 7 Napoleon Stewardyxgrgfkje y
> tgr ggqqcthpfnqyo oznjtet ft mogjvlsnqoirh lrw
> dh
Hi Ean,
--- Ean Schuessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and so forth... or alternatively you could use something more symbolic
> than version numbers. For instance:
>
> depends:
> java.lang.reflect.Proxy
> java.text.Bidi.reorderVisually
> java.io.ObjectOutputStream.useProtocolVersion.int
Your scheme is sound in theory, but isn't a solution for Java under the
Debian OS. It means that virtually all Java packages in Debian would sit
in contrib. That's just not acceptable.
Now that I am putting some real effort into Kaffe again I would like to
see an actual functioning framework of Ja
Your scheme is sound in theory, but isn't a solution for Java under the
Debian OS. It means that virtually all Java packages in Debian would sit
in contrib. That's just not acceptable.
I see two options to solve this:
1) Strict interpretation of javaN-runtime
Indeed, probably no free JVM will be a
Hallo Ean,
* Ean Schuessler wrote:
>be. Some of NIO might be available but 1.4 security contexts may be
>non-existant. Therefore, I imagine something more like:
>Kaffe 1.1.1
>provides:
> java.awt1.1
[...]
I see what you mean, but this will simple not work: How do you want to
use alternatives?
M
Title: FtWOH3oy
Fantastic! Debian-java XiY It's funny QvZqt
yCqg do you work? g Debian-java it's for you. MNMuZ
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I've just uploaded a new packaging of Kaffe-1.1.1. I've switched over to
DBS so this may or may not be a mess. Please give it a try and drop me a
line if there are problems.
Be warned in advance that my mail is filtered by TMDA. I know a lot of
you probably hate dealing with it but I find that it
Your proposal has merit but I don't think it goes far enough to really
solve the problem. At the center of the issue is the fact that Java has
grown so large that depending on a Sun Java release version is like
depending on Sun Solaris 2.6 because of some POSIX feature. To achieve
something usable
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
25 matches
Mail list logo
