Michael Tuschik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:50:00AM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
[...]
> > For the alternatives of javac (example):
> >
> > SelectionAlternative
> > ---
> > ...
> > *+7/usr/lib/j2se/1.4/bin/ja
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:50:00AM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>
> Maybe I did not understand the question (this is not the firt nor the
> last time ;-) ), but IMHO, the question was two packages from on source
> (jdk) or a jdk (from jdk with jre) and a jre (from the 'original jre
>
Michael Tuschik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah, ok. So packaging two packages for J2SDK and J2RE is the best way
> (IMHO). Installing multiple SDK/JRE should be allowed. Especially for
> developers this is a must-have.
Maybe I did not understand the question (this is not the firt nor the
la
Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Debian[1]. I think it's in the java faq. And another point is that
> >the license does not allow someone who use one of the tools from the
> >jdk to use a replacement tool!.. I think I am outlaw ;-)
> >
> Are you refering to:
> 5.3.1.4 Can I use jd
Debian[1]. I think it's in the java faq. And another point is that the
license does not allow someone who use one of the tools from the jdk to
use a replacement tool!.. I think I am outlaw ;-)
Are you refering to:
5.3.1.4 Can I use jdk1.2 while working with the free Java implementations?
If i
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 09:53:59AM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Michael Tuschik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 07:48:02PM +0200, Hubert Schmid wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The only possibility seems to create one package from the J2RE and one
> > > package from the
Hubert Schmid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> I have read the license agreements of the Java(TM) 2 SDK, Standard
> Edition 1.4.1_03 and Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition
> 1.4.1_03. Most parts of the agreements are about distribution. There
> is only one problem. The f
Michael Tuschik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 07:48:02PM +0200, Hubert Schmid wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The only possibility seems to create one package from the J2RE and one
> > package from the J2SDK and make them conflict on each other (because the
> > J2SDK also
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 07:48:02PM +0200, Hubert Schmid wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The only possibility seems to create one package from the J2RE and one
> package from the J2SDK and make them conflict on each other (because the
> J2SDK also contains an J2RE).
>
> Any other suggestions? Or should I i
Michael Tuschik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:50:00AM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
[...]
> > For the alternatives of javac (example):
> >
> > SelectionAlternative
> > ---
> > ...
> > *+7/usr/lib/j2se/1.4/bin/ja
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:50:00AM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>
> Maybe I did not understand the question (this is not the firt nor the
> last time ;-) ), but IMHO, the question was two packages from on source
> (jdk) or a jdk (from jdk with jre) and a jre (from the 'original jre
>
Michael Tuschik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah, ok. So packaging two packages for J2SDK and J2RE is the best way
> (IMHO). Installing multiple SDK/JRE should be allowed. Especially for
> developers this is a must-have.
Maybe I did not understand the question (this is not the firt nor the
la
Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Debian[1]. I think it's in the java faq. And another point is that
> >the license does not allow someone who use one of the tools from the
> >jdk to use a replacement tool!.. I think I am outlaw ;-)
> >
> Are you refering to:
> 5.3.1.4 Can I use jd
Debian[1]. I think it's in the java faq. And another point is that the
license does not allow someone who use one of the tools from the jdk to
use a replacement tool!.. I think I am outlaw ;-)
Are you refering to:
5.3.1.4 Can I use jdk1.2 while working with the free Java implementations?
If it
Hi,
I have read the license agreements of the Java(TM) 2 SDK, Standard Edition
1.4.1_03 and Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition 1.4.1_03.
Most parts of the agreements are about distribution. There is only one
problem. The first paragraph of the supplemental license terms says:
[..]
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 09:53:59AM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Michael Tuschik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 07:48:02PM +0200, Hubert Schmid wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The only possibility seems to create one package from the J2RE and one
> > > package from the
Hubert Schmid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> I have read the license agreements of the Java(TM) 2 SDK, Standard
> Edition 1.4.1_03 and Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition
> 1.4.1_03. Most parts of the agreements are about distribution. There
> is only one problem. The f
Michael Tuschik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 07:48:02PM +0200, Hubert Schmid wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The only possibility seems to create one package from the J2RE and one
> > package from the J2SDK and make them conflict on each other (because the
> > J2SDK also
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 07:48:02PM +0200, Hubert Schmid wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The only possibility seems to create one package from the J2RE and one
> package from the J2SDK and make them conflict on each other (because the
> J2SDK also contains an J2RE).
>
> Any other suggestions? Or should I i
Michael S Daines wrote:
I've been having a few problems which are clearly related to permissions and
some which may be. For example, when I load an app that creates DB tables, I
get a message right away about:
Jun 3, 2003 7:18:03 AM java.util.prefs.FileSystemPreferences$3 run
WARNING: Could not cr
I've been having a few problems which are clearly related to permissions and
some which may be. For example, when I load an app that creates DB tables, I
get a message right away about:
Jun 3, 2003 7:18:03 AM java.util.prefs.FileSystemPreferences$3 run
WARNING: Could not create system preferences
21 matches
Mail list logo
