Re: java newbie: gcj can't find its own jars?

2003-05-20 Thread Jonathan Brandmeyer
On Tue, 2003-05-20 at 17:04, Ivo Danihelka wrote: > It's interesting that both javac and jikes compile it successfuly. >From the Sun public specifications, section 7.5.2: http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/second_edition/html/packages.doc.html It is not a compile-time error to name the current pa

Re: EnterpriseJavaBeans and Debian

2003-05-20 Thread Joe Phillips
On Thu, 2003-05-15 at 13:58, Keegan Quinn wrote: > None is currently available. Just follow the normal instructions to install > in a local directory. Yeah, unless you want to build .debs yourself, you should just do a local install. > > Also, what are my alternatives for the application serve

Re: Hourra! Eclipse build on powerpc (was: Re: new eclipse builds)

2003-05-20 Thread Jan Schulz
* Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > WARNING: There are ONLY the powerpc specific packages, not all the > packages, so you also have to use the apt source from Jan: > deb[-src] http://www.katzien.de/debian/eclipse ./ Unfortunatelly I won't put up debs, only source. Sorry, but I don't have

Re: java newbie: gcj can't find its own jars?

2003-05-20 Thread Jonathan Brandmeyer
On Tue, 2003-05-20 at 17:04, Ivo Danihelka wrote: > java.lang.Math is not package, it is just class. > Comment the line "import java.lang.Math.*;" > > It's interesting that both javac and jikes compile it successfuly. The case came from some tutorial code that I inherited. After reading up on th

Re: java newbie: gcj can't find its own jars?

2003-05-20 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 03:38:28PM -0400, Jonathan Brandmeyer wrote: > What extra configuration is needed for gcj-3.3 to work? I have a fresh > installation of it, but it can't access its own jar and lib for the > standard packages. They are on the CLASSPATH, as shown by the -v output > below.

java newbie: gcj can't find its own jars?

2003-05-20 Thread Jonathan Brandmeyer
What extra configuration is needed for gcj-3.3 to work? I have a fresh installation of it, but it can't access its own jar and lib for the standard packages. They are on the CLASSPATH, as shown by the -v output below. I'm running Sid. Thanks, Jonathan ex.: - import java.lang.Math.*; publi

Hourra! Eclipse build on powerpc (was: Re: new eclipse builds)

2003-05-20 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 First I'd like to thank Jan Schulz for the good job and the help he gave me to make it happens: Eclipse now build on powerpc! You can [apt-]get the powerpc packages here: deb http://vbstefi60.fapse.ulg.ac.be/~arnaud/eclipse ./ WARNING: There are ONLY

accepting SUN's EULA

2003-05-20 Thread trivas7
Hello-- How do I accept SUN's EULA for j2sdk1.3 or is this not possible? I'm running Knoppix 3.2 -- it's testing/unstable I believe. Thanks. Tom R.

Re: EnterpriseJavaBeans and Debian

2003-05-20 Thread Schwerdtfeger,
Am Don, 2003-05-15 um 17.55 schrieb Michael S Daines: > OK. So I've managed to install the JDK finally (in a proper, Debian way). > Now > I need to get to a point where I can use EJBs. I'm taking a class now, so I > have zero experience with this area. > > I did download the files from Sun for

Re: new eclipse builds

2003-05-20 Thread Jan Schulz
Hi, Sorry for the PM... * Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > cp: cannot stat `debian/eclipse//usr/share/eclipse/plugins/\ > org.eclipse.sdk.linux.gtk_2.1.0': No such file or directory This happens, when ant runs out of memory, which happend here on blackdown java 1.3, but not with blac

Re: new eclipse builds

2003-05-20 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > The version of this packages is "-4.1"... I have still some > polishing on my todo List and I will have a closer look at the > updatemanager problem (updatemanger should not be possible for > /usr/share/eclipse and /usr/local/share/eclipse, as this dirs

Re: mozilla and java plugin, debian unstable

2003-05-20 Thread Joris
> > I installed Mozilla from the "stable" archive and it works fine with > > java, I think the problem is something I heard about different > > versions of gcc being used to build mozilla and java which causes a > > conflict, does this sound right to anyone? If so, what should I do > > to fix it?