Re: Eclipse2.1RC1 package

2003-03-02 Thread Jan Schulz
Hello, * Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I uploaded new eclipse package. Please check here: > But I think it's optional and it's the time to upload eclipse > into sid. If you don't think so, please give me comments. I used 'apt-get source -b eclipse' to build the packages for my wood

Re: Eclipse2.1RC1 package

2003-03-02 Thread Jan Schulz
Hello, * Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I uploaded new eclipse package. Please check here: > But I think it's optional and it's the time to upload eclipse > into sid. If you don't think so, please give me comments. I used 'apt-get source -b eclipse' to build the packages for my wood

Re: Eclipse2.1RC1: Bug?

2003-03-02 Thread Takashi Okamoto
From: Florian Steinsiepe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Eclipse2.1RC1: Bug? Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 18:20:05 +0100 > Probably there should be a strict separation between the DOM classes > of the JDK an the ones that Eclipse itself uses. I'm sure Eclipse > has its own ClassLoader and can provide th

Re: Eclipse2.1RC1: Bug?

2003-03-02 Thread Takashi Okamoto
From: Florian Steinsiepe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Eclipse2.1RC1: Bug? Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 18:20:05 +0100 > Probably there should be a strict separation between the DOM classes > of the JDK an the ones that Eclipse itself uses. I'm sure Eclipse > has its own ClassLoader and can provide th