Re: Eclipse2.1RC1: Bug?

2003-03-01 Thread Florian Steinsiepe
> IBM's xerces supports DOM Level2, but Apache's(libxerces2-java 2.3.0) > supports DOM Level3. I guess this is problem. j2sdk1.4 include DOM > Level2 org.w3c.dom packages and works correctly. > > I'll try to build Apache's xerces with DOM Level2. > > Takashi Okamoto > I think this is a general pr

Re: Eclipse2.1RC1: Bug?

2003-03-01 Thread Takashi Okamoto
From: Florian Steinsiepe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Eclipse2.1RC1: Bug? Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:57:43 +0100 > I greedily installed the Eclipse package and found it extremely unstable on > j2sdk1.4, so I went back to j2sdk1.3. Since then, some functions don't work > anymore and throw lots of NoS

Re: Eclipse2.1RC1: Bug?

2003-03-01 Thread Florian Steinsiepe
> IBM's xerces supports DOM Level2, but Apache's(libxerces2-java 2.3.0) > supports DOM Level3. I guess this is problem. j2sdk1.4 include DOM > Level2 org.w3c.dom packages and works correctly. > > I'll try to build Apache's xerces with DOM Level2. > > Takashi Okamoto > I think this is a general pr

Re: Eclipse2.1RC1: Bug?

2003-03-01 Thread Takashi Okamoto
From: Florian Steinsiepe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Eclipse2.1RC1: Bug? Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:57:43 +0100 > I greedily installed the Eclipse package and found it extremely unstable on > j2sdk1.4, so I went back to j2sdk1.3. Since then, some functions don't work > anymore and throw lots of NoS

Re: Bug#182466: libbatik-java: limited JRE depencies

2003-03-01 Thread Egon Willighagen
Op donderdag 27 februari 2003 16:54, schreef Ola Lundqvist: > > Packages that contain a runtime conforming to the Java 1.1 > > specification should provide java1-runtime. Packages that > > contain a runtime conforming to the Java 2 specification > > should provide java2-runtime. If a pack

Re: Sun's java SDK on Debian Woody.

2003-03-01 Thread Egon Willighagen
Op vrijdag 28 februari 2003 23:02, schreef David Jardine: > > We will now create the necessary links typing this into the > > console: > > > > $ ln -s /usr/local/bin/j2sdk1.4.1_01/bin* /usr/bin > > Why does it have to be moved? Doesn't this mess up > the Debian packaging system? W

Re: Bug#182466: libbatik-java: limited JRE depencies

2003-03-01 Thread Egon Willighagen
Op donderdag 27 februari 2003 16:54, schreef Ola Lundqvist: > > Packages that contain a runtime conforming to the Java 1.1 > > specification should provide java1-runtime. Packages that > > contain a runtime conforming to the Java 2 specification > > should provide java2-runtime. If a pack

Re: Sun's java SDK on Debian Woody.

2003-03-01 Thread Egon Willighagen
Op vrijdag 28 februari 2003 23:02, schreef David Jardine: > > We will now create the necessary links typing this into the > > console: > > > > $ ln -s /usr/local/bin/j2sdk1.4.1_01/bin* /usr/bin > > Why does it have to be moved? Doesn't this mess up > the Debian packaging system? W