Re: Eclipse2.1RC1 package

2003-02-28 Thread Takashi Okamoto
From: Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Eclipse2.1RC1 package Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 08:37:07 +0100 (CET) > | I don't have G3:( Please give error message. I may help you. > > Can not execute binary file (?) (maybe not the exact sentence but the > idea is here! ;-) It means I don't h

ORP(Re: JNI Again)

2003-02-28 Thread Takashi Okamoto
From: Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: JNI Again Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 18:24:26 +1100 > The /usr/lib/jni proposal is now implemented in sid for gij and sablevm, > patches are still available for other JVMs, a policy patch has been provided > and this has received two seconds and no disput

Re: Supporting CLASSPATH for /etc/alternatives/java

2003-02-28 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Second, should we specify that they should also treat the environment > variables like Sun's java? Specifically, that they should honor the > CLASSPATH variable? Please! > At least sablevm is providing an alternative for "java", but does not > seem to

Re: Eclipse2.1RC1 package

2003-02-28 Thread Takashi Okamoto
From: Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Eclipse2.1RC1 package Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 08:37:07 +0100 (CET) > | I don't have G3:( Please give error message. I may help you. > > Can not execute binary file (?) (maybe not the exact sentence but the > idea is here! ;-) It means I don't h

ORP(Re: JNI Again)

2003-02-28 Thread Takashi Okamoto
From: Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: JNI Again Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 18:24:26 +1100 > The /usr/lib/jni proposal is now implemented in sid for gij and sablevm, > patches are still available for other JVMs, a policy patch has been provided > and this has received two seconds and no disput

Re: Bug#182466: libbatik-java: limited JRE depencies

2003-02-28 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ola> I second this policy change. I would like one more to be able Ola> to apply it. Thirded (if it needed it). -- Stephen "And what do we burn apart from witches?"... "More witches!"

Re: Supporting CLASSPATH for /etc/alternatives/java

2003-02-28 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Second, should we specify that they should also treat the environment > variables like Sun's java? Specifically, that they should honor the > CLASSPATH variable? Please! > At least sablevm is providing an alternative for "java", but does not > seem to

Re: Bug#182466: libbatik-java: limited JRE depencies

2003-02-28 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ola> I second this policy change. I would like one more to be able Ola> to apply it. Thirded (if it needed it). -- Stephen "And what do we burn apart from witches?"... "More witches!" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Sun's java SDK on Debian Woody.

2003-02-28 Thread David Jardine
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 09:08:19PM +0100, JOSE MARIA wrote: > This is just my personal experience, hope it helps someone. > > > > - > How to install Sun?s Java sdk on Debian woody. > > This is my personal experience on how you should go about installing > Sun?s Sdk on woody linux. First

Sun's java SDK on Debian Woody.

2003-02-28 Thread JOSE MARIA
This is just my personal experience, hope it helps someone.     - How to install Sun’s Java sdk on Debian woody. This is my personal experience on how you should go about installing Sun’s Sdk on woody linux. First of all we must forget about using apt-get because there’s no good way

Re: Sun's java SDK on Debian Woody.

2003-02-28 Thread David Jardine
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 09:08:19PM +0100, JOSE MARIA wrote: > This is just my personal experience, hope it helps someone. > > > > - > How to install Sun?s Java sdk on Debian woody. > > This is my personal experience on how you should go about installing Sun?s Sdk > on woody linux. First

Sun's java SDK on Debian Woody.

2003-02-28 Thread JOSE MARIA
This is just my personal experience, hope it helps someone.     - How to install Sun’s Java sdk on Debian woody. This is my personal experience on how you should go about installing Sun’s Sdk on woody linux. First of all we must forget about using apt-get because there’s no good way

Re: Supporting CLASSPATH for /etc/alternatives/java

2003-02-28 Thread Daniel Bonniot
At least sablevm is providing an alternative for "java", but does not seem to look at the CLASSPATH. I was thinking about reporting this as a bug, but it would make more sense to clarify that issue in the policy. Not true, at least in unstable. I did install 1.0.6 by forcing the dependancy

Re: Supporting CLASSPATH for /etc/alternatives/java

2003-02-28 Thread Grzegorz B. Prokopski
W liście z pią, 28-02-2003, godz. 00:03, Daniel Bonniot pisze: > At least sablevm is providing an alternative for "java", but does not > seem to look at the CLASSPATH. I was thinking about reporting this as a > bug, but it would make more sense to clarify that issue in the policy. Not true, at l

Re: Eclipse for Debian-ppc [was: Re: Eclipse2.1RC1 package]

2003-02-28 Thread Jan Schulz
* Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you point me where I can get some documentation on how to do that > (or what command I have to do)... do I have to get the > gtk-dev-something packages? http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/~checkout~/platform-swt-home/faq.html But it is not r

Re: Supporting CLASSPATH for /etc/alternatives/java

2003-02-28 Thread Daniel Bonniot
At least sablevm is providing an alternative for "java", but does not seem to look at the CLASSPATH. I was thinking about reporting this as a bug, but it would make more sense to clarify that issue in the policy. Not true, at least in unstable. I did install 1.0.6 by forcing the dependanc

Re: Supporting CLASSPATH for /etc/alternatives/java

2003-02-28 Thread Grzegorz B. Prokopski
W liście z pią, 28-02-2003, godz. 00:03, Daniel Bonniot pisze: > At least sablevm is providing an alternative for "java", but does not > seem to look at the CLASSPATH. I was thinking about reporting this as a > bug, but it would make more sense to clarify that issue in the policy. Not true, at l

Re: Eclipse for Debian-ppc [was: Re: Eclipse2.1RC1 package]

2003-02-28 Thread Jan Schulz
* Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you point me where I can get some documentation on how to do that > (or what command I have to do)... do I have to get the > gtk-dev-something packages? http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/~checkout~/platform-swt-home/faq.html But it is not r

Re: Eclipse2.1RC1: Bug?

2003-02-28 Thread Jan Schulz
* Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> this Xerces is TOO NEW for Eclipse! I've extracted the Xerces JARs > BTW, 4.0.7 is IBM's versioning, it's not same as Apache's. I always thought, that the OTI folks just followed it. The Junit Jars and the plugin have the same version number. Jan

Eclipse for Debian-ppc [was: Re: Eclipse2.1RC1 package]

2003-02-28 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ___ / Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | The PPC stuff I did was really just playing around. I don't think I | made any changes at all to do that, just rebuilt the .so. Can you point me wh

Re: Eclipse2.1RC1: Bug?

2003-02-28 Thread Jan Schulz
* Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> this Xerces is TOO NEW for Eclipse! I've extracted the Xerces JARs > BTW, 4.0.7 is IBM's versioning, it's not same as Apache's. I always thought, that the OTI folks just followed it. The Junit Jars and the plugin have the same version number. Jan

Eclipse for Debian-ppc [was: Re: Eclipse2.1RC1 package]

2003-02-28 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ___ / Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | The PPC stuff I did was really just playing around. I don't think I | made any changes at all to do that, just rebuilt the .so. Can you point me wh

$BL$>5Bz9-9p"(!z2H$K$$$J$,$i2T(B$B$2$k%S%8%M%9!!=i4|!&7n3[MxMQ(B$BNA"M40A4L5NA!z%Q%/%Q%/%K%e!<(B$B%9!z(B

2003-02-28 Thread mg_paku8
<$BAw?.<$B;v6H$B!!3t<02q [EMAIL PROTECTED]"(B $B!!([EMAIL PROTECTED]"%a!<%k!JJV?.!K$7$F$/[EMAIL PROTECTED](B (B $B!2!2!2!2!2!2!2!2!2!2!2!2(B (B [EMAIL PROTECTED]/%Q%/!!%K%e!<[EMAIL PROTECTED](B $B!!!xHs2q0wMM8~$1FCJL9f!x(B $B!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1

Re: Eclipse2.1RC1 package

2003-02-28 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ___ / Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > "Jan" == Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | > AFAIK the only problem should be the swt library and I thought | > that this depends on

$BL$>5Bz9-9p"(!z2H$K$$$J$,$i2T(B$B$2$k%S%8%M%9!!=i4|!&7n3[MxMQ(B$BNA"M40A4L5NA!z%Q%/%Q%/%K%e!<(B$B%9!z(B

2003-02-28 Thread mg_paku8
<$BAw?.<$B;v6H$B!!3t<02q [EMAIL PROTECTED]"(B $B!!([EMAIL PROTECTED]"%a!<%k!JJV?.!K$7$F$/[EMAIL PROTECTED](B (B $B!2!2!2!2!2!2!2!2!2!2!2!2(B (B [EMAIL PROTECTED]/%Q%/!!%K%e!<[EMAIL PROTECTED](B $B!!!xHs2q0wMM8~$1FCJL9f!x(B $B!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!