Hi!
I have just uploaded debian packages of SableVM 1.0.6 JVM.
(you can find them at http://incoming.debian.org or later
- in ftp.debian.org/debian repositories)
These packages bring a number of improvements, mainly:
- improvements in reflection code (ANT works now!)
- added /usr/lib/jni to defau
Hi!
I have just uploaded debian packages of SableVM 1.0.6 JVM.
(you can find them at http://incoming.debian.org or later
- in ftp.debian.org/debian repositories)
These packages bring a number of improvements, mainly:
- improvements in reflection code (ANT works now!)
- added /usr/lib/jni to defau
___
/ "Thomas J. Zeeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| [...] Checking out the rest of the manpages I found most of them to
| contain those chars. In gvim they look asian (Japanese?).
|
| Anyone else out there with the same 'problem'? I'm usi
Hi,
Recently I wanted to check on a few options of javadoc and turned to its
manpage only to find it contained unreadable characters (at least to me
they were). Checking out the rest of the manpages I found most of them to
contain those chars. In gvim they look asian (Japanese?).
Anyone else out
___
/ "Thomas J. Zeeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| [...] Checking out the rest of the manpages I found most of them to
| contain those chars. In gvim they look asian (Japanese?).
|
| Anyone else out there with the same 'problem'? I'm usi
Hi,
Recently I wanted to check on a few options of javadoc and turned to its
manpage only to find it contained unreadable characters (at least to me
they were). Checking out the rest of the manpages I found most of them to
contain those chars. In gvim they look asian (Japanese?).
Anyone else out
Michael Schuerig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rupa Schomaker wrote:
>
>> Will there be a version of the JDK that is built with GCC 3.2?
We have released a gcc-3.2 based build a week ago. It's not available
as a .deb yet.
>> Now that the transition is on-going in unstable, it would be nice
>>
Rupa Schomaker wrote:
> Will there be a version of the JDK that is built with GCC 3.2? Now
> that the transition is on-going in unstable, it would be nice to be
> able to get the JDK in sync with the rest.
The relevant changes to gcc affect g++, the C++ compiler, and break
binary compatibility w
Michael Schuerig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rupa Schomaker wrote:
>
>> Will there be a version of the JDK that is built with GCC 3.2?
We have released a gcc-3.2 based build a week ago. It's not available
as a .deb yet.
>> Now that the transition is on-going in unstable, it would be nice
>>
Rupa Schomaker wrote:
> Will there be a version of the JDK that is built with GCC 3.2? Now
> that the transition is on-going in unstable, it would be nice to be
> able to get the JDK in sync with the rest.
The relevant changes to gcc affect g++, the C++ compiler, and break
binary compatibility w
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Rupa Schomaker wrote:
> Will there be a version of the JDK that is built with GCC 3.2? Now
> that the transition is on-going in unstable, it would be nice to be
> able to get the JDK in sync with the rest.
>
> eg: You can't use the java plugin with Mozilla anymore because Mo
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> Is there some documentation on how to do what I want (satisfy the "j2sdk1.4"
> package dependency) for tomcat4? I saw the man pages for equivs-build and
> equivs-control, but it'd be great if there was something that documented the
> whole proces
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Rupa Schomaker wrote:
> Will there be a version of the JDK that is built with GCC 3.2? Now
> that the transition is on-going in unstable, it would be nice to be
> able to get the JDK in sync with the rest.
>
> eg: You can't use the java plugin with Mozilla anymore because Mo
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> Is there some documentation on how to do what I want (satisfy the "j2sdk1.4"
> package dependency) for tomcat4? I saw the man pages for equivs-build and
> equivs-control, but it'd be great if there was something that documented the
> whole proces
14 matches
Mail list logo
