Re: Policy change proposal, Re: Bug#176628: sablevm: package incorrctly provides java1-runtime

2003-01-22 Thread Ben Burton
> This is where I stand right now with at least one package: I cannot > depend on java1-runtime because two of the three packages that provide > it *don't work*. By leaving the java1-runtime tag on the incomplete > VM packages, I'm required to maunally validate these packages > continuously or si

Re: Policy change proposal, Re: Bug#176628: sablevm: package incorrctly provides java1-runtime

2003-01-22 Thread Ben Burton
> This is where I stand right now with at least one package: I cannot > depend on java1-runtime because two of the three packages that provide > it *don't work*. By leaving the java1-runtime tag on the incomplete > VM packages, I'm required to maunally validate these packages > continuously or si

Re: Policy change proposal, Re: Bug#176628: sablevm: package incorrctly provides java1-runtime

2003-01-22 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ola> On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 12:30:07AM -0800, Dalibor Topic wrote: Ola> I think that major new things (i.e. swing and awt) from java1 Ola> (from 1.0, or maybe only from 1.1 and above) should be broken Ola> down. What doe you

Re: request feedback on JBOSS debs

2003-01-22 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Joe" == Joe Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Joe> On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 14:44, Adam Heath wrote: >> On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Greg Wilkins wrote: >> > + The setting of JAVA_HOME should be done by an auto search >> and/or > a debconf dialog. >> >> Use /etc/defaults/jbo