I am running an unstable Debian.
I have "apt-get"ed source java-common.
It was version 0.16.
A typo make it invalid XML.
References to the Debian policy do not seem correct.
I propose the attached patch.
--- policy.xml 2002-12-12 02:42:18.0 +0100
+++ policy.xml 2002-12-12 03:32:28.00
I am running an unstable Debian.
I have "apt-get"ed source java-common.
It was version 0.16.
A typo make it invalid XML.
References to the Debian policy do not seem correct.
I propose the attached patch.
--- policy.xml 2002-12-12 02:42:18.0 +0100
+++ policy.xml 2002-12-12 03:32:28.0
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:15:41PM +0100, Sobkowiak Krzysztof wrote:
>> Is it possible that I'll can use again j2sdk1.3.1 with Debian (Sid)
>> in nearest future?
>
> No it will never(?) work. Use j2sdk1.4 instead.
We'll make a fixed 1.3.1 version afte
On Wednesday 11 December 2002 11:19, Jan Krupa wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, [iso-8859-1] Francois BOTTIN wrote:
> > --- Jan Krupa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>I tried to compile the following file:
[..]
>
> and got the following message:
>
> 2002-12-10 18:19:48 java.util.prefs.FileSystemPrefere
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:15:41PM +0100, Sobkowiak Krzysztof wrote:
> Hallo
Hi
> Is it possible that I'll can use again j2sdk1.3.1 with Debian (Sid) in
> nearest future?
No it will never(?) work. Use j2sdk1.4 instead.
Regards,
// Ola
> --
> Sobkowiak Krzysztof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> BTU-Cott
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:15:41PM +0100, Sobkowiak Krzysztof wrote:
>> Is it possible that I'll can use again j2sdk1.3.1 with Debian (Sid)
>> in nearest future?
>
> No it will never(?) work. Use j2sdk1.4 instead.
We'll make a fixed 1.3.1 version afte
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, [iso-8859-1] Francois BOTTIN wrote:
> --- Jan Krupa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> >
> > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:
> > /usr/local/java/j2sdk1.4.1_01/jre/lib/i386/libfontmanager.so:
> > libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2: cannot open shared object f
On Wednesday 11 December 2002 11:19, Jan Krupa wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, [iso-8859-1] Francois BOTTIN wrote:
> > --- Jan Krupa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>I tried to compile the following file:
[..]
>
> and got the following message:
>
> 2002-12-10 18:19:48 java.util.prefs.FileSystemPrefere
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:15:41PM +0100, Sobkowiak Krzysztof wrote:
> Hallo
Hi
> Is it possible that I'll can use again j2sdk1.3.1 with Debian (Sid) in
> nearest future?
No it will never(?) work. Use j2sdk1.4 instead.
Regards,
// Ola
> --
> Sobkowiak Krzysztof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> BTU-Cott
Hallo
Is it possible that I'll can use again j2sdk1.3.1 with Debian (Sid) in
nearest future?
--
Sobkowiak Krzysztof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
BTU-Cottbus
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, [iso-8859-1] Francois BOTTIN wrote:
> --- Jan Krupa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> >
> > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:
> > /usr/local/java/j2sdk1.4.1_01/jre/lib/i386/libfontmanager.so:
> > libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2: cannot open shared object f
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Tom Badran wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 Dec 2002 7:20 pm, Miguel Rubio wrote:
> > Does someone know what's happening, and how to solve it ?
>
> Upgrade mozilla. Mozilla built against old glibc wont work with java.
Nor will any sun/blackdown java < 1.4 work with any libc6 > 2.3 [0
Hallo
Is it possible that I'll can use again j2sdk1.3.1 with Debian (Sid) in
nearest future?
--
Sobkowiak Krzysztof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
BTU-Cottbus
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
13 matches
Mail list logo