> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 12:26:34AM +, Conrad Wood wrote:
>> hmm.. is there something like a jdk-dev package that follows
>> some well-defined standard on what is included? Or is it worth
>> putting a jdk-config script
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 12:26:34AM +, Conrad Wood wrote:
>> hmm.. is there something like a jdk-dev package that follows
>> some well-defined standard on what is included? Or is it worth
>> putting a jdk-config script
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 12:26:34AM +, Conrad Wood wrote:
> hmm.. is there something like a jdk-dev package that follows some
> well-defined standard on what is included? Or is it worth putting
> a jdk-config script in each jdk package (similar to gtk-config)
> I don't really want to make it dep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Sonntag, 8. Dezember 2002 16:16 schrieb Brett Sealey:
> On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Max Gilead wrote:
> > Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> > >libc version. However, sun has a really sick idea, where files should be
> > > in the /usr or /usr/local tree :-(
> >
> > I
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Max Gilead wrote:
> Hendrik Sattler wrote:
>
> >libc version. However, sun has a really sick idea, where files should be in
> >the /usr or /usr/local tree :-(
> >
> I don't know about such requirement. I run Sun's JDK from /home tree and
> it runs fine.
He must have been us
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
libc version. However, sun has a really sick idea, where files should be in
the /usr or /usr/local tree :-(
I don't know about such requirement. I run Sun's JDK from /home tree and
it runs fine.
Max
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 12:26:34AM +, Conrad Wood wrote:
> hmm.. is there something like a jdk-dev package that follows some
> well-defined standard on what is included? Or is it worth putting
> a jdk-config script in each jdk package (similar to gtk-config)
> I don't really want to make it dep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Sonntag, 8. Dezember 2002 16:16 schrieb Brett Sealey:
> On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Max Gilead wrote:
> > Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> > >libc version. However, sun has a really sick idea, where files should be
> > > in the /usr or /usr/local tree :-(
> >
> > I
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Max Gilead wrote:
> Hendrik Sattler wrote:
>
> >libc version. However, sun has a really sick idea, where files should be in
> >the /usr or /usr/local tree :-(
> >
> I don't know about such requirement. I run Sun's JDK from /home tree and
> it runs fine.
He must have been us
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
libc version. However, sun has a really sick idea, where files should be in
the /usr or /usr/local tree :-(
I don't know about such requirement. I run Sun's JDK from /home tree and
it runs fine.
Max
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
10 matches
Mail list logo
