Re: Dynamic Array

2002-12-05 Thread Jean-francois PARIS
> Dear Java Gurus, hello and thanks a lot for calling me a guru > I am newbie in java. > Please point me on Handling Dynamic Array of String like String[][]. In > my case Vector is not suitable. I think you have missed the point. This list is for solving the issues that araise with java on debia

Dynamic Array

2002-12-05 Thread Odo
Dear Java Gurus, I am newbie in java. Please point me on Handling Dynamic Array of String like String[][]. In my case Vector is not suitable. -- Odo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Dynamic Array

2002-12-05 Thread Odo
Dear Java Gurus, I am newbie in java. Please point me on Handling Dynamic Array of String like String[][]. In my case Vector is not suitable. -- Odo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Planned mass-filing of bugs: java packages only depending on java-common

2002-12-05 Thread Stefan Gybas
Stephen Zander wrote: Depending on the core classes does not provide javac which is what the autobuilders actually require. The build dependencies for Java packages could be for example: jikes, classpath, lib*-java (all other required Java packages) If all lib*-java packages in main depend on java1

Re: Planned mass-filing of bugs: java packages only depending on java-common

2002-12-05 Thread Stephen Zander
Ok, I should stop reading mail at 3am... > "Simon" == Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Simon> I think the autobuilder argument is valid. Autobuilders Simon> need the classes, but not the VM. If at all, you can make Simon> the VMs depend on the core classes, so people can

Re: Planned mass-filing of bugs: java packages only depending on java-common

2002-12-05 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Simon" == Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Simon> I think the autobuilder argument is valid. Autobuilders Simon> need the classes, but not the VM. If at all, you can make Simon> the VMs depend on the core classes, so people can depend on Simon> the core classes for c

Re: Planned mass-filing of bugs: java packages only depending on java-common

2002-12-05 Thread Simon Richter
Stephen, > Ola, we go round and round on this. Having java1-runtime only mean > the java.* classes doesn't add anything. Packages shouldn't have to > depend on two virtual packages; java1-rutime should be a superset of > the functionality of java-virual-machine not a disjoint set. I think the a

Re: Planned mass-filing of bugs: java packages only depending on java-common

2002-12-05 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ola> This is false. If the package provides the core classes it Ola> should provide java1-runtime but NOT java-virtual-machine. If Ola> it provides the virtual-machine it should provide Ola> java-virtual-machine. If this is no

Re: Planned mass-filing of bugs: java packages only depending on java-common

2002-12-05 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ola> This is false. If the package provides the core classes it Ola> should provide java1-runtime but NOT java-virtual-machine. If Ola> it provides the virtual-machine it should provide Ola> java-virtual-machine. If this is no

Re: Planned mass-filing of bugs: java packages only depending onjava-common

2002-12-05 Thread Stefan Gybas
Stephen Zander wrote: Depending on the core classes does not provide javac which is what the autobuilders actually require. The build dependencies for Java packages could be for example: jikes, classpath, lib*-java (all other required Java packages) If all lib*-java packages in main depend on

Re: Planned mass-filing of bugs: java packages only depending onjava-common

2002-12-05 Thread Stephen Zander
Ok, I should stop reading mail at 3am... > "Simon" == Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Simon> I think the autobuilder argument is valid. Autobuilders Simon> need the classes, but not the VM. If at all, you can make Simon> the VMs depend on the core classes, so people can

Re: Planned mass-filing of bugs: java packages only depending onjava-common

2002-12-05 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Simon" == Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Simon> I think the autobuilder argument is valid. Autobuilders Simon> need the classes, but not the VM. If at all, you can make Simon> the VMs depend on the core classes, so people can depend on Simon> the core classes for c

Re: Planned mass-filing of bugs: java packages only depending on java-common

2002-12-05 Thread Simon Richter
Stephen, > Ola, we go round and round on this. Having java1-runtime only mean > the java.* classes doesn't add anything. Packages shouldn't have to > depend on two virtual packages; java1-rutime should be a superset of > the functionality of java-virual-machine not a disjoint set. I think the a

Re: Planned mass-filing of bugs: java packages only depending onjava-common

2002-12-05 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ola> This is false. If the package provides the core classes it Ola> should provide java1-runtime but NOT java-virtual-machine. If Ola> it provides the virtual-machine it should provide Ola> java-virtual-machine. If this is no

Re: Planned mass-filing of bugs: java packages only depending onjava-common

2002-12-05 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ola> This is false. If the package provides the core classes it Ola> should provide java1-runtime but NOT java-virtual-machine. If Ola> it provides the virtual-machine it should provide Ola> java-virtual-machine. If this is no

Re: Planned mass-filing of bugs: java packages only depending on java-common

2002-12-05 Thread Ola Lundqvist
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:43:55PM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote: > > "Stefan" == Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Stefan> Currently the following packages in testing provide > Stefan> java1-runtime: gij-3.0, gij-3.2, orp-classpath and > Stefan> sablevm. All of them include

Re: Planned mass-filing of bugs: java packages only depending on java-common

2002-12-05 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Stefan" == Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stefan> Currently the following packages in testing provide Stefan> java1-runtime: gij-3.0, gij-3.2, orp-classpath and Stefan> sablevm. All of them include (or depend on) a Java virtual Stefan> machine so if I add this depen